The Christian View of the Old TestamentEiselen, Frederick Carl
Religion
The Christian View of the Old Testament
Eiselen, Frederick Carl
Bible. Old Testament -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
exodus; he believes that the latter were still in Goshen at the time of
this defeat.[9] Still others believe that the Israelites were, at the
time of the defeat, in the wilderness south of Palestine, and that the
claim of Merneptah is simply an attempt to account for their
disappearance from Egypt. And now comes Eerdmans, of Leiden, with the
suggestion that the Israelites defeated by Merneptah were the
Israelites before they went down to Egypt.[10] It is seen, therefore,
that the reference on the stele of Merneptah, while of much interest,
because it is the first mention of Israel in an Egyptian inscription,
after all throws little light upon the date and the events of the
exodus.
The next monument of importance contains an account of the invasion of
Palestine by Shishak, five years after the death of Solomon. On the
southern wall of the court of the great temple of Amen at Karnak the
king has left a pictorial representation of his campaign. A giant
figure is represented as holding in his left hand the ends of ropes
which {130} bind long rows of captives neck to neck. Their hands are
tied behind them, and the victor's right hand holds a rod with which he
threatens them. The names of the conquered cities are inscribed on
shields that cover the lower part of the body of each prisoner. Some
of the most familiar names in this list are Gaza, Abel, Adullam,
Bethhoron, Aijalon, Gibeon, and Shunem.[11]
From about the middle of the ninth century on inscriptions containing
references to kings of Israel, or to events in which the Hebrews played
important parts, become more numerous. To the reign of Omri (889-875)
and his immediate successors refers the inscription of Mesha on the
so-called Moabite Stone.[12] This notable specimen of antiquity is a
stone of a bluish-black color, about two feet wide, nearly four feet
high, and fourteen and one-half inches thick; rounded at the top, and,
according to the testimony of the discoverer, the Rev. F. Klein, also
at the bottom, which, however, is doubtful. The value of the stone
lies not only in the fact that it preserves one of the most ancient
styles of Hebrew writing, but more especially in the historical,
topographical, and religious information it furnishes. In 2 Kings 3 we
read of the relations between Moab and Omri and his successors. Omri
had subdued Moab and had collected from her a yearly tribute. Ahab had
enjoyed the same revenue, amounting during {131} Mesha's reign to the
wool of a hundred thousand lambs and a hundred thousand rams. At the
close of Ahab's reign Mesha refused to continue the payment of the
tribute. The allied kings of Israel, Judah, and Edom marched with
their armies against the Moabites, who fled for refuge within the
strong fortress of Kir-hareseth, where Mesha offered up his own son as
a burnt-offering to Chemosh, his god; whereupon "there was great wrath
against Israel, and they departed from them and returned to their own
land."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account