The Chronicle of the Discovery and Conquest of Guinea. Vol. IIZurara, Gomes Eannes de
History
The Chronicle of the Discovery and Conquest of Guinea. Vol. II
Zurara, Gomes Eannes de
Guinea (Region) -- Discovery and exploration -- Early works to 1800
world-picture of great size and magnificence, possessing in its time
considerable official importance, must not lead us to take it as an
example of cartographical perfection.
[Footnote 281: Cp. also the elliptical Florentine example of
1447 (Nordenskjöld, _Facsimile Atlas_, 116), or Leardus'
Mappemondes of 1448 and 1452 (_ibid._ 61).]
[Footnote 282: "Sinus Ethiopicus:" very similar to that
depicted on the Leardus of 1448. On the southern side of this
is "Fundan."]
[Footnote 283: Perhaps a Ptolemaic concession.]
[Footnote 284: Still more is this the case with Asia, where
Fra Mauro is in some ways more satisfactory than anywhere
else, and contrasts well even with the "Harleian" or Dieppe
Map of _c._ 1536, and many other similar works.]
* * * * *
The use of the magnetic needle is essentially connected with the
portolan type of map; this instrument was well known to Prince Henry's
sailors, and is referred to by the Infant himself as being, like the
sailing chart, a necessity for navigators.[285] But it could hardly come
into general employment till men reached beyond the mediæval stage of a
magnetic needle enclosed in a tube so as to float on water.
[Footnote 285: _Azurara_, ch. ix.]
In the Discovery of the Compass four stages may be distinguished:
(1) The discovery of a species of stone with polar-magnetic qualities,
_i.e._, with the power of attracting iron.
(2) The discovery that steel or hardened iron could be made
polar-magnetic by rubbing it with a lode-stone.
(3) The discovery that the magnet (or magnetised iron) possessed the
quality of definite direction, one of its poles always indicating the
north, if it were so supported or suspended that it could move freely.
(4) The discovery of using the magnetised iron needle as a compass.
The first dates from a high antiquity, and is noticed by Plato,
Theophrastus, Pliny, Ptolemy, Claudian, and many writers of the Mediæval
as well as of the Classical period. The subsequent advances we cannot
date, for Europe, earlier than the twelfth century; when Alexander
Neckam and Guyot de Provins (_c._ 1190-1200) show us that some
investigators had advanced as far as the third of the stages above
recounted.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account