The chronicles of Enguerrand de Monstrelet, Vol. 04 [of 13] : $b containing an account of the cruel civil wars between the houses of Orleans and Burgundy, of the possession of Paris and Normandy by the English, their expulsion thence, and of other memorable events that happened in the kingdom of France, as well as in other countriesMonstrelet, Enguerrand de
History
The chronicles of Enguerrand de Monstrelet, Vol. 04 [of 13] : $b containing an account of the cruel civil wars between the houses of Orleans and Burgundy, of the possession of Paris and Normandy by the English, their expulsion thence, and of other memorable events that happened in the kingdom of France, as well as in other countries
Monstrelet, Enguerrand de
Europe -- History -- 476-1492 -- Sources; France -- History -- House of Valois, 1328-1589; Hundred Years' War, 1339-1453
On the last day but one in March, duke William declared in the
full audience of the king's council at Paris, that he would unite
the dauphin with the duke of Burgundy or carry the dauphin back to
Hainault, if measures were not instantly taken for restoring peace to
the kingdom. The ministers, hearing this, resolved that the duke should
be arrested and confined until he had given up the dauphin to the king
his father.
The duke was secretly informed of this by a friend; and on the
morrow very early, under pretext of performing a pilgrimage to St
Maur-des-Fosses, and returning to Paris in the evening, he hastened
with only two attendants to Compiegne. He found the dauphin most
dangerously ill, insomuch that he died on Palm Sunday: his disorder was
an imposthume in the ear, which burst and suffocated him. When dead, he
was put into a leaden coffin, and buried at St Corneille[52], in the
presence of duke William, his lady, and the dauphiness, who gave large
sums for masses to be said for the welfare of his soul. The duke and
his family returned in great grief to Hainault.
It was commonly reported, that the dauphin had been poisoned by some of
those who governed the king, because he and his elder brother had been
too much attached to the duke of Burgundy.
FOOTNOTES:
[Footnote 52: St Corneille de Compiegne,--an abbey near that town.]
CHAP. XLVII.
THE NEAPOLITANS REBEL AGAINST THEIR KING, JACQUES DE LA MARCHE, AND
MAKE WAR ON HIM.--THEY TAKE THE QUEEN PRISONER. THE CONSEQUENCES THAT
FOLLOW.
This year the Neapolitans rebelled against king James count de la
Marche, and would have made him prisoner, had he not been informed in
time of their intentions. They confined the queen, and made a bitter
war against him and his supporters. The constable and the lord de St
Maurice, his father-in-law, were imprisoned. The king, for his greater
security, embarked on board a brigantine for the castle del Ovo,
leaving a good garrison in Castel Nuovo.
This war lasted until the 27th day of October in the same year, when
peace was made on condition that all the French who held any offices in
the kingdom should depart and return to their own country, excepting
the very few employed personally to serve the king.
On the conclusion of the peace, the king and queen returned to Castel
Nuovo, when all persons renewed their oaths of allegiance, promising
to consider him as their king during his life, but that he was no
way to interfere in the government of the kingdom. His establishment
of guards, attendants and horses, were all arranged according to the
pleasure of the Neapolitans.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account