The Church of Grasmere: A HistoryArmitt, Mary L. (Mary Louisa)
History
The Church of Grasmere: A History
Armitt, Mary L. (Mary Louisa)
St. Oswald's Church (Grasmere, England)
any respects to be done At A generall Charge of the wholl parish
be equall portions without any deniall & likewise the haske &
joules at A general Charge of the parish and likewise A fonte
At A generall charge to be maintained In Testamony thereof we
the said eightenne have sette our honds the day & yeare ffirst
above-written.
[The names of the Eighteen follow, under three headings of
Gresmyre, Loughrigg, and Langdall. They are often crossed through
and written again. On the other side of the MS. is given the
following list.]
The names of the Eighteen of the parish of Grasmere as they now
stand, April the 24th, 1688.
Grasmere Langdale Loughrigg and
beneath Moss
Reignald Thompson George Cooperthwaite John Banks
John Haukrigg Christopher Dawson Reignald Brathwaite
John Hird James Dixon Hendry Barrow
John Haukrigg John Middlefell Thomas Benson
Robert Harrisin William Satterthwaite Thomas Newton
Edwin Green Leonard Benson Thomas Mackereth
Something has already been said of the constitution of the parish,
and of the lay control which existed over its finances--the three
townships within the parish being represented by a body of eighteen
(six for each) as well as by two churchwardens; and this document,
while it strengthens the suggestion that the great addition to the
church had been carried out by the united parish, and at the expense
of the three townships--shows us exactly how each township arranged
to fulfil its obligation to maintain the building in proper repair.
It was an intricate matter. Each township by a common agreement made
itself responsible for the maintenance of a particular portion of
the church, not only of the fittings, but of the walls and windows
of the fabric, as well as of the garth outside, with the garth wall
down to its own particular gate of entrance.[137] There were besides
general charges, along with the expenses of the Sunday worship,
in which all took an equal share. Such an undertaking--both joint
and individual--may seem to a merely modern mind a complicated
business, especially as the church consisted structurally of two
parts, which had to be divided for purposes of finance into three.
But such problems were as nothing to men whose farmholds belonged to
a township (indivisible in itself) that was broken up into several
lordships, and whose land--though permanent in quantity--was every
year freshly apportioned within the common fields of his _vill_. The
subsequent accounts of the churchwardens, of which a few have already
been given, prove that the obligations incurred by this document were
rigidly fulfilled.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account