The Church of Sancta Sophia, Constantinople: A Study of Byzantine BuildingLethaby, W. R. (William Richard)
Religion
The Church of Sancta Sophia, Constantinople: A Study of Byzantine Building
Lethaby, W. R. (William Richard)
Ayasofya Müzesi
When this, the church of the world, fell into the hands of the Turks,
many stories came to the West, or arose there without coming. The
poetry of the Fall required the miraculous salvation of the priest
celebrating mass, and the prophecy of his return as told by Theo.
Gautier. It also required a massacre in the church, the riding in of
the proud conqueror, and the mark of his blood-stained hand, which
indeed is still pointed out some twenty feet above the pavement!
Mijatovich, in his history of the last of the emperors, regards the
massacre as unhistorical.
An English romance almost contemporary with the Fall tells us how the
Turks took possession,
“For to let theyr hawkys fly
In the chirch of Saint Sofy.”
CHAPTER VIII
FOSSATI’S REPARATIONS. SALZENBERG’S DESCRIPTION.
Sancta Sophia seems really to have been in a dangerous condition when,
in 1847, the Sultan Abdul Mesjid began a much-needed work of reparation
which was carried on under the guidance of the Italian architect
Fossati, who appears to have taken great pains, and notwithstanding
some alterations and “restorations” in the worst sense he deserves
our gratitude for probably saving the building. In the preface to his
lithograph views published in London in 1852 he says, “The portions of
the building that looked most threatening were reconstructed, and the
lead roofs were repaired. The dome was relieved of four heavy buttress
arches, whose function was taken by a double ceincture of iron around
its base. Thirteen columns of the gynaeceum, which were inclining under
the thrust of the great arches that support the dome, were put straight
again.” The marble work of the interior was cleaned, and the gold
mosaic vaults were cleared of the crust of limewash which concealed
them. All representations of figures were however covered again. The
sultan’s tribune was built, Fossati says, “in the Byzantine style.” The
walls outside, after being repaired, were covered with a coating of
plaster on which red stripes were painted.
Since this time various remains of the Great Court, which existed as
late as 1873, have entirely disappeared, and the broad bare space, in
front of the exonarthex, has little now to recall the atrium with its
fountain and quadriporticus.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account