The Church of Sancta Sophia, Constantinople: A Study of Byzantine BuildingLethaby, W. R. (William Richard)
Religion
The Church of Sancta Sophia, Constantinople: A Study of Byzantine Building
Lethaby, W. R. (William Richard)
Ayasofya Müzesi
_Domes._--In elaborating his theory of Byzantine dome construction
Choisy refers to a passage in Eton’s _Turkish Empire_[343] which
describes domes the latter saw built without any kind of centring.
The builders put a post in the middle about the height of the walls.
To this is fixed a pole reaching to the _inside_ surface of the dome,
which is _free to move in all directions_. Below is attached to the
post another pole, which reaches to the outside and describes the
outside curvature of the cupola. These give the thickness at the top
and bottom and at every intermediate point. “Where they build these
cupolas of bricks they use gypsum instead of lime, finishing one layer
all round before they begin another. Scaffolding is only required for
the workmen to close the opening at the top.” Our diagram A, Fig. 42,
represents this fascinating scheme of building: with such a rod any
point in the whole curvature is defined in a moment; it equally gauges
the horizontal courses and the rise of the dome. Choisy suggests a
second scheme which will be made clear by B. There is no reason, he
points out, why the beds of the bricks in a dome should radiate to the
centre of the curve: in the Byzantine domes the beds were flattened
so that they radiated more or less accurately to the springing of
the opposite side of the dome. The thrusts were thus minimised, and
the construction was facilitated. If rods forming a triangle revolve
about a vertical post as shown, the horizontal curvature is gauged
and the top rod will define the slope for the bed. These rods can
then be raised to another position as shown in the figure. We should
have supposed that little care would be taken with the slope of the
beds, as from the thin bricks used the construction practically became
homogeneous.
Choisy even thinks that the great dome of S. Sophia may have been built
in the air without centring. C, in Fig. 42, gives his representation of
the construction of the semidomes, which he thinks were built out some
way entirely without support. The outer arch was then built on a centre
and the filling completed “in space” (a straight joint between the arch
and the dome filling is shown in the figure in Salzenberg’s text). We
think it more likely that in all the larger domes auxiliary support was
required “to close the opening at the top,” when the space had been so
contracted that a light centring resting on the part already completed
was all that would be needed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account