The Church of Sancta Sophia, Constantinople: A Study of Byzantine BuildingLethaby, W. R. (William Richard)
Religion
The Church of Sancta Sophia, Constantinople: A Study of Byzantine Building
Lethaby, W. R. (William Richard)
Ayasofya Müzesi
[Illustration: FIG. 24.--Plans of Additions to West End. A and C North
and South Porches; B Belfry.]
The north and south porches and great lateral stairways, which
injuriously altered the exterior, must also have been built by Michael
or Basil, as we find them mentioned in the _Book of Ceremonies._
In October 975 an earthquake caused the “hemisphere with the western
arch (_apsis_) to fall.”[205] They were restored again by the same
emperor in six years: he spent, Scylitzes says, “on the machines for
mounting for the workmen to stand on, and for raising the scaffolding,
to build what was fallen; ten centenaria of gold.”[206] According to
Glycas, Romanus Argyrus (1028) beautified the capitals; Scylitzes also
says this emperor “made bright with silver and gold both the capitals
of the great church and of our Lady of Blachernae.”[207]
The injuries wrought by the Crusaders to S. Sophia are referred to
in Chapter V. Baldwin was crowned here in 1204, and for fifty-seven
years Catholic priests read masses at its altar. On the recapture the
Byzantine emperors made an effort to restore, but the church never
recovered its former splendour. The patriarch Arsenius during the
reign of Michael Palaeologus “restored the bema and ambo and solea at
the king’s expense, besides enriching the church with vestments and
sacred vessels.”[208] In the first half of the fourteenth century,
Andronicus Palaeologus, the elder, strengthened the north and east
sides. Nicephorus Gregoras says the emperor “heard from several
experienced builders that in a short time the parts towards the
north and east would give way, and fall unless strengthened. And he
built pyramidal structures from the foundations and prevented the
threatened destruction,” but bricks and mosaic continued to fall.[209]
The pyramidal structures to the east must be the four great sloping
buttresses which stand over the low attached buildings on that side;
they are shown on Fossati’s plan. Gregoras also inveighs against the
Empress Anna as having, in the reign of Cantacuzenus, robbed the church
of furniture and ornaments, and says that tyranny and oppression were
the chief causes of the destruction of the church. Cantacuzenus, in his
own history,[210] speaks of the damage caused by an earthquake in 1346,
when about a third of the roof fell, destroying “the great stoa by the
side of the bema” (perhaps the iconostasis). This is also referred to
by Gregoras, “the easternmost of the four arches which rival heaven
fell, dragging with it the part of the house which rested on it. The
hidden beauty of the bema was destroyed as well as its ornaments of
sacred icons.”[211] The stoa and bema were restored by the Empress
Anna, the wife of Andronicus Palaeologus, Phaceolatus being prefect
of the works, but the upper parts with the roof had to wait until the
accession of Cantacuzenus in 1347. He restored the decoration both
in marble and mosaic, a work which John Palaeologus finished. Both
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account