The Church, the Falling Away, and the RestorationShepherd, J. W. (James Walton)
Religion
The Church, the Falling Away, and the Restoration
Shepherd, J. W. (James Walton)
Churches of Christ -- Doctrines; Disciples of Christ -- Controversial literature; Disciples of Christ -- Doctrines
4. That although the Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments are
inseparably connected, making together but one perfect and entire
revelation of the divine will, for the edification and salvation of
the Church, and therefore in that respect can not be separated, yet as
to what directly and properly belongs to their immediate object, the
New Testament is as perfect a constitution for the worship, discipline
and government of the New Testament Church, and as perfect a rule for
the particular duties of its members, as the Old Testament was for the
worship, discipline and government of the Old Testament Church, and
the particular duties of its members.
5. That with respect to the commands and ordinances of our Lord Jesus
Christ, where the Scriptures are silent as to the express time or
manner of performance, if any such there be, no human authority has
power to interfere, in order to supply deficiency by making laws for
the Church; nor can anything more be required of Christians in such
cases, but only that they so observe these commands and ordinances as
will evidently answer the declared and obvious end of their
institution. Much less have any human authority power to impose new
commands or ordinances upon the Church, which our Lord Jesus Christ
has not enjoined. Nothing ought to be received into the faith or
worship of the Church, or be made a term of communion among
Christians, that is not as old as the New Testament.
6. That although inferences and deductions from Scripture premises,
when fairly inferred, may be truly called the doctrine of God’s holy
Word, yet are they not formally binding upon the consciences of
Christians farther than they perceive the connection, and evidently
see that they are so; for their faith must not stand in the wisdom of
men, but in the power and veracity of God. Therefore no such
deductions can be made the terms of communion, but do properly belong
to the after and progressive edification of the Church. Hence, it is
evident that no such deductions or inferential truth ought to have any
place in the Church’s confession.
7. That although doctrinal exhibitions of the great system of divine
truths and defensive testimonies in opposition to prevailing errors be
highly expedient, and the more full and explicit they be for those
purposes the better; yet, as these must be in a great measure the
effect of human reasoning, and of course must contain many inferential
truths, they ought not to be made terms of Christian communion, unless
we suppose, what is contrary to fact, that none have a right to the
communion of the Church, but such as possess a very clear and decisive
judgment, or are come to a very high degree of doctrinal information;
whereas the Church from the beginning did, and ever will, consist of
little children and young men, as well as fathers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account