The Church, the Falling Away, and the RestorationShepherd, J. W. (James Walton)
Religion
The Church, the Falling Away, and the Restoration
Shepherd, J. W. (James Walton)
Churches of Christ -- Doctrines; Disciples of Christ -- Controversial literature; Disciples of Christ -- Doctrines
Well then, since His Imperial Majesty wants a plain answer, I will
give him one without horns or teeth. Unless I am convinced of error by
the testimony of Scriptures or clear arguments—for I believe neither
the pope nor the councils alone, which have erred and contradicted
each other often—I am convinced by the passages of Scripture which I
have cited, and my conscience is bound by the Word of God. I can not
and will not recant anything, for it is neither safe nor right to act
against one’s conscience. Such is my profession of faith, and expect
no other from me. Here I stand, I can not do otherwise. God help me,
Amen!
In astonishment, the emperor suggested the question whether Luther
actually was of the opinion that councils could err, and he was promptly
answered by Luther:
Of course; because they have often erred. For, since the council of
Constance decided in many points against the clear text of Holy
Scripture, Holy Scripture forces me to say that councils have erred.
Eck declared that it could not be proved that general councils had
erred. Luther said he could prove they had. The disputation that they
said they would avoid was beginning. The emperor, seeing this, arose,
and all the assembly with him. Eck cried out in a loud, clear voice:
“The diet will meet again to-morrow to hear the emperor’s opinion.” It
was night; each man retired to his home in darkness. Two imperial
officers escorted Luther. Some supposed that his fate was decided and
that they were leading him to prison, whence he would never return till
he was brought out to be burned at the stake. A great tumult arose. Some
cried out, “Are they taking him to prison?” “No,” replied Luther, “they
are only accompanying me to my hotel.” At these words the excitement
subsided.
UNDER IMPERIAL BAN
Luther had produced a profound impression on the chiefs of the empire,
and many lords and princes were won to his cause. On the next morning
the emperor submitted to the estates of the empire the proposition to
immediately dismiss Luther, and then on the expiration of his
self-conduct, to proceed against him as a heretic. On May 26th, after a
majority of the diet had departed from Worms, an imperial edict against
Luther was passed, and published as the “unanimous act of the Electors
of the States.” In order to make it appear that the emperor’s signature
was affixed when all the members of the diet were assembled, it was
dated May 8th. It decreed against Luther the imperial ban; after
applying to him the usual severe expressions of the papal bulls, it
said:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account