Cities and towns; Social psychology; Sociology; Sociology, Urban
The term “community” is widely used by sociologists, neighborhood
workers, and others, but often with widely divergent meanings. In
research in any field it is necessary to define our concepts and to make
relevant distinctions. In the literature of the subject there is a
growing disposition to emphasize as one of the fundamental aspects of
the community its geographical setting. Whatever else the community may
be, it signifies individuals, families, groups, or institutions located
upon an area and some or all of the relationships which grow out of this
common location. “‘Community’ is the term which is applied to societies
and social groups where they are considered from the point of view of
the geographical distribution of the individuals and institutions of
which they are composed.”[70]
Upon reflection it is evident that markedly different social
relationships may have their roots in the conditions of a common
territorial location. Indeed, it is just these outstanding differences
in communal activities, viewed in relation to their geographic
background, which have caused much of the confusion in the use of the
term “community.” For community life, as conditioned by the distribution
of individuals and institutions over an area, has at least three quite
different aspects.
First of all, there is the community viewed almost exclusively in terms
of location and movement. How far has the area itself, by its very
topography and by all its other external and physical characteristics,
as railroads, parks, types of housing, conditioned community formation
and exerted a determining influence upon the distribution of its
inhabitants and upon their movements and life? To what extent has it had
a selective effect in sifting and sorting families over the area by
occupation, nationality, and economic or social class? To what extent is
the work of neighborhood or community institutions promoted or impeded
by favorable or unfavorable location? How far do geographical distances
within or without the community symbolize social distances? This
apparently “natural” organization of the human community, so similar in
the formation of plant and animal communities, may be called the
“ecological community.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account