The Clergyman's Hand-book of Law: The Law of Church and GraveScanlan, Charles Martin
Religion
The Clergyman's Hand-book of Law: The Law of Church and Grave
Scanlan, Charles Martin
Burial laws -- United States; Ecclesiastical law -- United States
*456.* _Negroes, Indians._—The fact that a man is a negro, Indian, or
other racial human being, is not good ground to prevent his burial in a
cemetery.(803)
*457.* _Will, Body, Custody._—Where no disposition of a body has been made
by will, the surviving husband, or wife, or next of kin, has the right to
the body for the purpose of burial. But the right of the surviving wife or
husband, if they were living together at the time of the death of
deceased, is paramount to that of the next of kin.(804) A right to the
custody of the body of a deceased relative and to decide upon the final
place of burial where the deceased is unmarried, is in his next of kin,
and this right will be protected by the courts.(805)
*458.* _Non-Residence, Burial._—Non-residence does not divest a person of
the right to burial with his relatives.(806)
*459.* _State, Vacate, Equity, Rule._—The State may require the removal of
the bodies and vacate a cemetery without compensation to lot owners in
some extraordinary cases of eminent domain or as a health measure.(807)
Courts of equity exercise some discretion in cases that do not fall within
this rule.(808) But the superintendent of a cemetery has no right to
remove a child without the consent of the father who owns the lot.(809)
*460.* _Consent, Bishop, Removal._—With the consent of deceased’s husband
before the funeral, the father of deceased paid for the lot in which his
daughter wished to be buried with her parents. Her mother being
dissatisfied with the location, the lot was subsequently exchanged for
another in the same cemetery; but after preliminary arrangements had been
made, the son-in-law applied to a court of equity for a writ restraining
the father and the bishop from removing the body. The bishop answered that
he was willing to conform to any order of the court. The court held that
by acceding to his wife’s request and allowing her father to bury her in
the first instance, and by standing mute while the arrangements for the
removal of the body were being made, the husband had no right thereafter
to prevent the removal of his wife’s body.(810)
*461.* _Court, Remove, Consent._—In a proper case a court may grant a
decree to remove the body of a relative from one cemetery to another.(811)
Otherwise no one has the right to exhume or remove a body without the
consent of those having charge of the cemetery and of those having the
right of burial, as consort or the next of kin. In some States the offense
is a felony.(812) In Nebraska, at least, those who have the legal right to
bury a relative may remove his body from one Catholic cemetery to another
without the consent of the bishop.(813)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account