The Close of the Middle Ages, 1272-1494, 3rd Ed.Lodge, Richard, Sir
History
The Close of the Middle Ages, 1272-1494, 3rd Ed.
Lodge, Richard, Sir
Middle Ages
At this critical moment the evils of France were suddenly multiplied by
the rising of a class for which neither king, nobles, nor citizens had
done anything. The [Sidenote: The Jacquerie.] serfs or villeins of
France had suffered terrible hardships within the last decade. Their
numbers had been decimated by the Black Death, and the survivors had to
add to their own tasks the work of those who had perished. Their
hard-won savings had been wrung from them to pay the ransom of their
lords, who had fallen into the hands of the English at Poitiers or
elsewhere. The lands from which they extracted a scanty living were
devastated by the mercenary soldiers in peace as well as in war.
Despairing of redress, they determined, at any rate, to avenge their
sufferings. The story of their revolt is one of almost unredeemed
horror. It began in the district of Beauvais, and rapidly spread over
Champagne, Picardy, and the Ile-de-France. Castles were burned; men,
women, and even children were tortured and put to death. But the nobles
soon recovered from the first panic, and took arms against enemies whom
they now loathed as much as they had previously despised them. The
ill-armed peasants were unable to face the trained men-at-arms, and the
suppression of the revolt was as murderous and destructive as its
outbreak.
There was little real sympathy between peasants and bourgeois. They had,
it is true, a common enemy in the nobles, and Marcel had tried to use
the Jacquerie as a diversion in his own favour. But he gave no efficient
aid to his allies, and his half-hearted connection only brought upon
himself the discredit and disaster of their ruinous defeat. From the
victorious troops of the nobles the regent was able to form an army for
the reduction of his rebellious capital. The citizens were bellicose,
but they were not warlike, and it was necessary to bring trained troops
to [Sidenote: Siege of Paris.] the aid of their undisciplined valour.
Charles of Navarre was appointed captain-general of Paris, and brought a
mercenary army for its defence. But the king’s aims were as purely
selfish as ever. While professing to defend the city, he was negotiating
with the regent for its surrender. Such proceedings excited serious
mistrust, which was increased by quarrels between the citizens and the
soldiers of Navarre. At last the king left Paris for St. Denis, and
further resistance seemed almost hopeless. The citizens were willing to
make terms, but the Dauphin would not negotiate with the murderer of the
marshals. Marcel felt that in such a dilemma he could no longer trust
his followers. A party was already formed within the city which was
hostile to his continued ascendency, and in favour of restoring the
royal authority. If the citizens had to choose between their own safety
and the interests of their provost, their choice could not be long
delayed. There was only one apparent means of escape, and Marcel
clutched at it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account