The Close of the Middle Ages, 1272-1494, 3rd Ed.Lodge, Richard, Sir
History
The Close of the Middle Ages, 1272-1494, 3rd Ed.
Lodge, Richard, Sir
Middle Ages
Yet it is hardly probable that this impression was shared by
contemporary spectators. To them the struggle must have seemed to
involve questions of vital importance. No previous contest between the
rival heads of Christendom had produced so much literature, or
literature of such merit and significance. Michael of Cesena, the
general of the Franciscan Order, John of Jandun, and William of Ockham,
‘The Invincible Doctor,’ exhausted the subtleties of the scholastic
philosophy in their championship of the imperial position against papal
pretensions. Above all, Marsiglio of Padua, in his great work the
_Defensor Pacis_, examined with equal acuteness and insight the
fundamental relations of the spiritual and secular powers, and laid down
principles which were destined to find at any rate partial expression in
the Reformation.[7]
This outburst of literary and philosophical activity was due in great
part to the fact that for the first time in the long strife between
Papacy and Empire, the struggle involved doctrinal differences. Hitherto
the contest had been between Church and State, and the Church had been
for the most part united. But, on the present occasion, the Church was
profoundly divided. The great Franciscan Order had been founded by the
professed advocate of clerical poverty. In course of time this original
principle [Sidenote: The Franciscans and the Pope.] had been departed
from, and the Order had amassed considerable wealth, though it had been
found desirable to conceal the change by making the Pope the trustee,
and giving the Order the mere usufruct of its property. This lapse from
the strictness of the original rules had given rise to a schism within
the Order. The Spiritual Franciscans, or Fraticelli, maintained that
Christ and the Apostles held no individual or corporate property, and
that the Church was bound to copy the examples of its founders. This
doctrine, which was accepted by a chapter of the Order in 1322, was not
likely to find favour with a Pope who was accused, with good reason, of
avarice. John XXII., urged on by the Dominicans, denounced the doctrine
as heretical, and thereby alienated the Franciscans, who could plead in
their favour a bull of Nicolas III., and appealed from the authority of
the Pope to a General Council of the Church. In common hostility to John
XXII., the Franciscans espoused the cause of Lewis the Bavarian, and it
was among them that he found his most enthusiastic champions, and his
most influential advisers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account