The Close of the Middle Ages, 1272-1494, 3rd Ed.Lodge, Richard, Sir
History
The Close of the Middle Ages, 1272-1494, 3rd Ed.
Lodge, Richard, Sir
Middle Ages
who takes arms against his imperial overlord is declared to forfeit both
life and property: whoever refuses to take up arms at the summons of the
Emperor is pronounced guilty of felony. The decrees of Frankfort seem to
promise a revival of the German monarchy.
In spite of all these advantages on the side of the Emperor, the quarrel
ended, not exactly in a papal triumph, yet in the complete and
humiliating discomfiture of Lewis. Doubtless the personal character of
the Emperor [Sidenote: Causes of Lewis’s failure.] contributed
essentially to this result. Lewis was well-meaning but vacillating: he
could take strenuous measures under the influence of a stronger will,
but when he lost his adviser his habitual irresolution and his
superstitious dread of the terrors of excommunication returned upon him.
To carry through the contest he required the firmness, the intellectual
craft, and the want of reverence of a Philip the Fair; and he had none
of these qualities. On more than one critical occasion, when success
seemed within his grasp, he alienated and disgusted his supporters by
grovelling offers to purchase absolution by surrendering all the
principles which were at stake in the quarrel. Moreover, the doctrinal
disputes in which he became involved, although a source of weakness to
the Pope, were not an equal source of strength to the Emperor. The
Franciscans had many powerful opponents, especially in the great rival
Order of St. Dominic, and these were alienated from the Emperor by his
alliance with a faction in the Church. The Franciscan cause rested upon
an unpractical enthusiasm which could not command the lasting support of
the clergy, accustomed as they were to wealth and to the influence which
it confers. And in the end, the strong corporate spirit of the Church
was inevitably aroused and alienated by the spectacle of a secular ruler
interfering in questions of dogma, and claiming a right of
interpretation and decision.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account