The Close of the Middle Ages, 1272-1494, 3rd Ed.Lodge, Richard, Sir
History
The Close of the Middle Ages, 1272-1494, 3rd Ed.
Lodge, Richard, Sir
Middle Ages
project was perforce abandoned on the news of the death of Gian Galeazzo
(September 3, 1402). From this time the rival Kings of the Romans
abstained from direct attacks on each other, and contented themselves
with their respective obedience, the one in the west and the other in
the east. Germany was so accustomed to dispense with any active exercise
of the royal authority that the schism created little excitement and
less inconvenience.
The schism in the Church was far more important to Europe, though the
chief actors were hardly more imposing than the rival emperors. The
position of the Papacy was necessarily shaken by the contentions of two
old men, each claiming to exercise divine authority, and each cursing
the other with human petulance. The religious were shocked by such a
spectacle: the irreligious laughed and mocked. A contemporary remarks
that for a long time Christians had had an earthly god who forgave their
sins, but now they have two such gods, and if one will not forgive their
sins, they go to the other. The prolonged scandal forced men to change
their conception of papal power, and to contend that such power does not
exist for its own ends, but for the sake of the whole Church. If
therefore that power is grossly abused, it is the right and even the
duty of the Church to interfere on behalf of its suffering [Sidenote:
The idea of a General Council.] members. Hence arose the conciliar idea,
which dominates all other ecclesiastical conceptions in the first half
of the fifteenth century. The Church, as represented by a General
Council, is superior to the head, as the whole body is superior to any
member. This idea found its main support in the Universities, especially
in Paris, Oxford, and Prague. The schism in the Empire and the
prominence of the University of Paris enabled France to take the
foremost place in urging the summons of a Council to put an end to
ecclesiastical anarchy. France had already adopted a policy of
neutrality in 1398, and had gone so far as to besiege Avignon and to
make Benedict XIII. a prisoner. But a reaction had set in when no other
power followed the example of France, and the Orleanist party, in
opposition to the Duke of Burgundy, had espoused the cause of Benedict.
In 1402, to the great chagrin of the University of Paris, France
returned to its allegiance, and Benedict, released from his captivity,
journeyed to the coast of Provence and opened negotiations with his
rival in Rome. The last two Roman Popes, Innocent VII. and Gregory XII.,
had only been elected on the express condition that they would resign as
soon as their opponent did the same. Gregory XII. went so far as to make
an agreement [Sidenote: Negotiations between the two Popes.] with
Benedict, by which the two Popes pledged themselves to create no new
cardinals, and to meet together at Savona in 1407. The agreement was
probably insincere on Gregory’s part, and at any rate there were
powerful influences at work to prevent its execution.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account