The Close of the Middle Ages, 1272-1494, 3rd Ed.Lodge, Richard, Sir
History
The Close of the Middle Ages, 1272-1494, 3rd Ed.
Lodge, Richard, Sir
Middle Ages
But it is important to remember that the Hussite movement had a secular
as well as an ecclesiastical side. Bohemia [Sidenote: Political aspect
of the Hussite movement.] was a Slav state, and for centuries there had
been a conflict between Slavs and Germans. At one time the Slavs had
advanced along the southern shores of the Baltic almost as far as the
North Sea. But, harassed by the attacks of the Magyars, they had been
unable to hold their own, and had gradually been subdued or driven
eastwards by German influences, represented by the Dukes of Saxony, the
Margraves of Brandenburg, the Hanseatic League, and finally the
crusading order of the Teutonic Knights. At the end of the fourteenth
century this steady eastward advance of the Germans met with a severe,
and to some extent a permanent, check. No doubt the chief agency in
effecting this was the success of the Jagellon kings of Poland in their
war with the Teutonic Order. But the Hussite movement belongs to the
same Slav reaction, and for a time contributed almost as directly as
Polish victories to assure the successful resistance of the Slavs. Hus
himself, born of humble parentage in the village of Husinec, was
profoundly imbued with popular sympathies, and lost no opportunity of
identifying himself and his teaching with the national cause. And in
this aim he was served by events in the University of Prague, where he
early rose to a distinguished position. Founded in the days of Bohemian
ascendency under Charles IV., the University had from the first
attracted a large number of German teachers and students, and had become
far larger and more distinguished than any purely German university.
Like the Paris University, on which it had been modelled, it was divided
into four nations—Bohemians, Poles, Bavarians, and Saxons. After the
foundation of a Polish university at Cracow, the Polish nation at Prague
had come to be composed mainly of Germans from Silesia, Pomerania, and
Prussia. Thus to all intents and purposes the University was composed of
two nations, Germans and Bohemians, of whom the former had three times
as much power as the latter. In all questions which were decided by the
vote of the nations, the Germans had three votes to one, and as offices
went in rotation to the four nations, they had three turns to the
Bohemian one. As the divergent interests of Slavs and Germans became
accentuated by political and religious differences, the inferiority of
the Bohemians in their own University became more and more of a
grievance. It was on religious questions that the quarrel was most
embittered. The majority of the orthodox party in the University
consisted of Germans, and they denounced the growth of Wycliffite
heresy. A German teacher brought forward a number of propositions which
had been attributed to Wyclif and condemned by a Synod in London. In
spite of the opposition of Hus and his Bohemian supporters, the majority
in the University voted that the doctrines were heretical, and
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account