The Close of the Middle Ages, 1272-1494, 3rd Ed.Lodge, Richard, Sir
History
The Close of the Middle Ages, 1272-1494, 3rd Ed.
Lodge, Richard, Sir
Middle Ages
Eugenius presided at the Council which met at Ferrara in 1438 and on the
outbreak of the plague was transferred to [Sidenote: Council of Ferrara
or Florence, 1438-9.] Florence. Months were spent in futile debates on
the differences between the two Churches. By far the most prominent
subject of discussion was the great _filioque_ controversy. The Latin
Church had added these words to the original wording of the creed as
fixed at the Council of Nicæa, while the Greek Church had never adopted
them. The other differences which gave rise to debate were the use of
leavened or unleavened bread in the sacrament, the doctrine of
purgatory, and the papal supremacy. The Greek Church, as the petitioning
body, was ultimately forced to accept, without being convinced, the
Roman views on all four questions. A decree for the union of the two
Churches was drawn up, and Eugenius thought he was celebrating the
crowning triumph of the Papacy (July 6, 1439). But, as far as actual
results went, the triumph was premature. The Greeks at home refused to
accept the decision of their representatives, and clamoured that they
had been betrayed. Nor did John VI. gain any aid to make up for the
unpopularity he had incurred. Western Europe was fatally divided against
itself, and paid little heed to the safety of Constantinople. The union
of the Greek and Latin Churches remained a mere document.
The quarrel between the Pope and the Council of Basel had become
irreconcilable when the latter was deserted by all the adherents of
Eugenius, and when Cesarini was succeeded [Sidenote: Attitude of France
and Germany.] as president by the Archbishop of Arles. The result of the
quarrel could only be decided by the adhesion of the secular states to
one side or the other. The two states to which the Council chiefly
looked for support were Germany and France, the countries from which
most of the remaining members were drawn. But these two states, instead
of warmly espousing the cause of the Council, seemed rather inclined to
take advantage of the schism to establish their own ecclesiastical
independence. In 1438 a synod of French clergy accepted the [Sidenote:
Pragmatic Sanction of Bourges, 1438.] famous Pragmatic Sanction of
Bourges, the foundation of the liberties of the Gallican Church. This
measure adopted, in the special interests of France, most of the decrees
against the papal power which had been carried in the Council as
applying to the whole Church. France was beginning to recover from the
prolonged wars with Burgundy and England, and the Pragmatic Sanction
offered the supreme advantage of checking the drain of French wealth to
fill the coffers of the Pope. In Germany Sigismund had died in 1437, and
the electors and leading princes began by adopting a policy of strict
neutrality between the Council and the Papacy. But the policy adopted by
France offered temptations both to lay and clerical princes, and a diet
at Mainz drew up what was practically the German equivalent of the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account