The Close of the Middle Ages, 1272-1494, 3rd Ed.Lodge, Richard, Sir
History
The Close of the Middle Ages, 1272-1494, 3rd Ed.
Lodge, Richard, Sir
Middle Ages
English and French troops were now fighting each other as auxiliaries on
Scottish soil, and it was obvious that the two countries must soon be
involved in open strife. The final impulse was supplied by events in
Flanders. In the fourteenth [Sidenote: Flanders.] century Flanders was
the most important trading and manufacturing country in western Europe.
Ghent was the Manchester, and Bruges the Liverpool, of that day. In
Bruges we are told that merchants from seventeen kingdoms had settled
homes, while strangers journeyed thither from all parts of the known
world. It was the great centre-point of mediæval commerce, where the
products of north, south, and east were brought together and exchanged
against each other. Still more important to the Flemings themselves and
to their relations with England was the manufacture of wool. England
produced the longest and finest wool, which was woven into cloth and
worsted on the looms of Ghent and Ypres. With France, on the other hand,
the relations of the Flemings were purely political. The Count of
Flanders, who found his subjects very difficult to govern, was the
vassal of the French king, and his authority could hardly be maintained
without the aid of his suzerain. To the material interests of the
Flemings France was almost wholly alien. France, as contrasted with the
other states of Europe, was little affected by the commercial spirit of
the age. While Edward III. and the Black Prince, who appear in the pages
of Froissart as mirrors of chivalry, were yet sufficiently practical to
encourage the industrial interests of their subjects, the Valois kings
pursued a totally different policy. They crushed industry by excessive
and ill-judged imposts. They maintained no police to give safety to the
foreign merchant, and foreign wares were kept out of France by the
insecurity of the roads and the heavy duties upon imports. This
difference is paralleled by the difference in the military system of the
two countries. The English king, supported by the growing wealth of his
subjects, was able to leave the majority of his people at home, and to
make war with a well-paid and equipped mercenary army. The King of
France, after extorting all he could wring from the pockets of his
subjects, compelled them to serve in the old feudal array, and led them
to be butchered by opponents who were numerically inferior, but had been
trained to war, and were not distracted from the work before them by the
sense that they were neglecting their material interests at home.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account