The Close of the Middle Ages, 1272-1494, 3rd Ed.Lodge, Richard, Sir
History
The Close of the Middle Ages, 1272-1494, 3rd Ed.
Lodge, Richard, Sir
Middle Ages
After the battle of Poitiers matters seemed more hopeless than ever. The
king’s eldest son, Charles,[6] assumed the government on his father’s
imprisonment, but he displayed little of the wisdom or capacity for
which he was afterwards renowned. His first act was to convene the
States-General [Sidenote: States-General of Oct. 1356.] on October 17.
The assembly was unusually large, the third estate being represented by
exceptional numbers. Of the nobles, however, the attendance was very
small. Large numbers of them had perished at Poitiers, and the survivors
were discredited. Thus the balance of classes, so necessary for the
success of constitutional changes, was overthrown. The third estate
became preponderant in the assembly, and its leader, Marcel, obtained
considerable support from the clergy through his ally Robert Lecoq,
Bishop of Laon. The demands of the estates were far more extreme than
those of the earlier assemblies. They were no longer content to impose
checks upon the government, but determined to take it into their own
hands. The royal ministers were to be dismissed, and thirty-six
delegates—twelve from each estate—were to be appointed to manage the
affairs of the kingdom. At the same time, outspoken complaints were made
of the failure to carry out promised reforms, especially in the matter
of the coinage, and the release of the King of Navarre was demanded. But
the Dauphin, encouraged by the grant of a considerable subsidy from the
estates of Languedoc, was not prepared to hand over his authority to the
States-General. He prorogued the assembly, endeavoured to raise money
from the provincial estates, and even ventured on a new debasement of
the currency. The reforming party was driven by this obstinacy to
revolutionary methods. The mob rose in Paris, and Marcel ordered the
royal officials to cease minting the inferior coins. The Dauphin, who
had gone to Metz to demand the mediation of Charles IV. with England,
returned to find his capital in open revolt. Unable to resist the
popular demands, he was forced to hold a new meeting of the
States-General on February 5, and to accept the ordinance which they
drew up of March 3, 1357. In [Sidenote: Ordinance of March 3, 1357.]
this the policy which had been proposed in the earlier session was
carried out, and the royal power was subordinated to that of the States.
The commission of thirty-six was definitely appointed to superintend
every branch of the administration. An aid was granted for the
maintenance of 3000 men-at-arms, but it was to be collected and spent,
not by royal officials, but by nominees of the States. The predominance
of the third estate is conspicuous in the articles directed against the
nobles. They were forbidden to carry on private wars, and if they
disregarded the prohibition, the local authorities or the people might
arrest them and compel them to desist by fines or imprisonment. Not only
was purveyance forbidden, but it was permitted to the people to assemble
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account