The long reign of Fīroz seems to have established his coinage as
a popular medium of exchange; and this probably accounts for the
prolonged series of his posthumous billon coins, extending over a
period of forty years. Some of these and of the posthumous issues of
his son, Muḥammad, and of his grandson, Maḥmūd, were struck by Daulat
Ḵẖ̱ān Lodī and Ḵẖ̱iẓr Ḵẖ̱ān, two sultans who refused to assume
the insignia of royalty. The coinage of the Lodī family, Bahlol,
Sikandar and Ibrāhīm, despite the difference in standard, bears a
close resemblance to that of the Sharqī kings of Jaunpūr. The first
and the last minted copper and billon, Sikandar and his son, Maḥmūd, a
pretender (1529), billon only. Bahlol (1450-1489) issued a large billon
coin, the _Bahlolī_, of about 145 grains (Pl. VIII, 13), and also a
copper piece of 140 grains, first introduced by Fīroz, with its half
and quarter divisions. The mint name, Dehlī, appears on both Bahlol’s
and Sikandar’s coins, but it is frequently missing from the latter,
as the dies were made larger than the coin discs. The name _Shahr
Jaunpūr_, “The City Jaunpūr,” occurs on the later copper of Bahlol
after his reduction of the Sharqī kingdom in 1476. On their billon
coins all three kings adopt the formula, “_Trusting in the merciful
one_,” but on his larger copper pieces Bahlol retained the old,
“_Deputy of the commander of the faithful_.” In 1526 Ibrāhīm Lodī was
overthrown and killed on the field of Pānīpat by the Mug̱ẖal Bābur;
and once again the fortunes of the Indian coinage changed under the
auspices of a foreign dynasty.
[Illustration: Fig. 8. Akbar’s Ilāhī formula. Cf. Pl. X, 8 (obverse).]
VIII
THE COINAGES OF THE MUHAMMADANS STATES
All the states whose coinages form the subject of this chapter, with
the exception of Kashmīr, were once provinces subject to the Dehlī
Sultans, and owed their independence to the ambition of powerful
viceroys, who took advantage at various times of the weakened control
of the central power. The earliest issues of each state were more or
less close imitations of the Dehlī currency, but local conditions soon
introduced modifications in standard and fabric, and in the course of a
century each had generally acquired a well-defined and characteristic
coinage of its own. Prosperity was usually short-lived; the inevitable
period of decay set in; and the coinage, confined at the close to
ill-struck copper pieces, illustrates history in striking fashion.
Bengal, however, was able to maintain its silver currency to the last.
I. THE COINAGE OF THE GOVERNORS AND SULTANS OF BENGAL
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account