example of a Mug̱ẖal mint called solely by an honorific epithet.
The great system of coinage illustrated by the Mug̱ẖals, operating
over such wide territories, needed, as has been already remarked,
a master hand to control it. With the dissensions which set in
between rival claimants to the empire on the death of Aurangzeb,
the controlling power was weakened. The diminished resources of his
treasury compelled the emperor, Farruḵẖ̱siyar (1713-19), to adopt the
fatal policy of farming out the mints. This gave the _coup de grâce_ to
the system, and henceforward, as will be related in the next chapter,
we find independent, and semi-independent chiefs and states striking
coins of their own, but always with the nominal consent of the Dehlī
emperor, and almost invariably in his name. Not until the nineteenth
century was the Mug̱ẖal style and superscription generally discarded.
Such was the coinage of the “Great Mogul.” Considering it as the
output of a single dynasty, which maintained the high standard and
purity of its gold and silver for three hundred years, considering
also its variety, the number of its mints, the artistic merit of some
of its series, the influence it exerted on contemporary and subsequent
coinages, and the importance of its standard coin—the rupee—in the
commerce of to-day, the Mug̱ẖal currency surely deserves to rank as
one of the great coinages of the world.
[Illustration: Fig. 10. Gurmukhī Script on Sikh Coins, _Akāl Sahāī:
Gūrū Nānakjī_.]
X
CONTEMPORARIES AND SUCCESSORS OF THE MUG̱H̱ALS
The neighbours of the Mug̱ẖals were not slow to recognise the
excellence of their coinage. Even the Ṣafavī monarchs of Persia adopted
certain features. The East Himalayan kingdom of Assam, hitherto content
to use the money of Bengal, and the adjacent state of Nepāl, which had
been without a coinage of its own for centuries, within fifty years of
Akbar’s accession had both adopted the rupee standard.
I. THE COINAGE OF ASSAM
Assam, the ancient Kāmarūpa, had been invaded in A.D. 1228 by the
Ahoms, a Shan tribe from Burma, and finally subdued by them in 1540.
By the year 1695 the royal family had definitely submitted to the
influence of Hinduism. Previously to that date, expression of devotion
to the tribal gods Lengdun, Tara and Phatuceng appears on the coins;
but the reverse legend of a coin of the Śaka year 1618 (A.D. 1696),
struck by Rudra Siṁha (1696-1714), runs as follows, in the highly
poetical Sanskrit so characteristic of later coin inscriptions: “_A bee
on the nectar of the feet of Hara and Gaurī_.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account