The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 01 (of 12)Hazlitt, William
General
The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 01 (of 12)
Hazlitt, William
English essays -- 19th century
before the modern refinements in morals and manners were heard of. It
would have been interesting enough to have been admitted as a by-stander
in such a scene, at such a time, to have heard and witnessed something
of what was going on. But here we are more than spectators. We have not
only ‘the outward pageants and the signs of grief’; but ‘we have that
within which passes shew.’ We read the thoughts of the heart, we catch
the passions living as they rise. Other dramatic writers give us very
fine versions and paraphrases of nature; but Shakespear, together with
his own comments, gives us the original text, that we may judge for
ourselves. This is a very great advantage.
The character of Hamlet stands quite by itself. It is not a character
marked by strength of will or even of passion, but by refinement of
thought and sentiment. Hamlet is as little of the hero as a man can well
be: but he is a young and princely novice, full of high enthusiasm and
quick sensibility—the sport of circumstances, questioning with fortune
and refining on his own feelings, and forced from the natural bias of
his disposition by the strangeness of his situation. He seems incapable
of deliberate action, and is only hurried into extremities on the spur
of the occasion, when he has no time to reflect, as in the scene where
he kills Polonius, and again, where he alters the letters which
Rosencraus and Guildenstern are taking with them to England, purporting
his death. At other times, when he is most bound to act, he remains
puzzled, undecided, and sceptical, dallies with his purposes, till the
occasion is lost, and finds out some pretence to relapse into indolence
and thoughtfulness again. For this reason he refuses to kill the King
when he is at his prayers, and by a refinement in malice, which is in
truth only an excuse for his own want of resolution, defers his revenge
to a more fatal opportunity, when he shall be engaged in some act ‘that
has no relish of salvation in it.’
‘He kneels and prays,
And now I’ll do’t, and so he goes to heaven,
And so am I reveng’d: _that would be scann’d_.
He kill’d my father, and for that,
I, his sole son, send him to heaven.
Why this is reward, not revenge.
Up sword and know thou a more horrid time,
When he is drunk, asleep, or in a rage.’
He is the prince of philosophical speculators; and because he cannot
have his revenge perfect, according to the most refined idea his wish
can form, he declines it altogether. So he scruples to trust the
suggestions of the ghost, contrives the scene of the play to have surer
proof of his uncle’s guilt, and then rests satisfied with this
confirmation of his suspicions, and the success of his experiment,
instead of acting upon it. Yet he is sensible of his own weakness, taxes
himself with it, and tries to reason himself out of it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account