The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 02 (of 12)Hazlitt, William
General
The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 02 (of 12)
Hazlitt, William
English essays -- 19th century
This produced a short consultation between the solicitor general, the
other counsel for the crown, and Mr White. They were evidently
surprised, and not pleased, at his appearance; and one of them, Mr
Knapp, began an argument to prove that he admitted himself to be the
person indicted. He was interrupted by the Chief Justice, who again
asked if the counsel for the crown thought fit to move that he should be
committed? which was accordingly moved by the Solicitor General; and he
was taken into custody by a Sheriff’s Officer, Mr Cawdron.
After naming Messieurs Erskine and Gibbs for his counsel, Mr Holcroft
asked the bench whether he might be allowed an amanuensis, while he was
preparing his defence; but this request was declined by the Chief
Justice, unless it was urged on the score of health. Mr Holcroft was
really in a state of ill-health; but as that was not his motive for
asking it, he would not take advantage of this circumstance.
The court then adjourned; but he was detained three quarters of an hour:
the reason assigned was, that the warrant was making out; but Mr
Holcroft believed the true reason to be, that the crown-lawyers were
consulting how he was to be treated, and sending to the higher powers
for instructions.
About half-past one o’clock the same day, a person came to Mr Holcroft’s
house, in Newman Street, inquired if he was at home, and seemed at first
unwilling to tell his business. He said he came from Mr Munden; but
afterwards owned he was not a friend of Mr Munden, but pretended that he
had been with him to inquire Mr Holcroft’s place of abode. He repeatedly
asked the Miss Holcrofts if they were sure he was not at home; and they
by this time suspecting him to be an officer, replied, he might search
the house, though he might be assured their father was not at home, for
that he had never taught them to tell untruths; and to prove their
sincerity, added, that he was gone to the Privy Council to surrender
himself. ‘No;’ answered he; ‘that he certainly is not; _for I am but
just come from the Privy Council_.’ He then shewed his watch, that they
might take notice it was half-past one o’clock. Mr Holcroft’s daughters
replied, that they might be mistaken, and if so, that he was gone to the
Old Bailey.—Being now understood to be a messenger, they asked if he
intended to come in and take their father’s papers; for, on shewing his
authority, he was at liberty to make any search. He replied, that _there
was quite sufficient without the papers_; after which, he went away,
saying, that if the accused had surrendered himself, it would save him
trouble.
These circumstances being related to Mr Holcroft, led him to believe
that a messenger had been despatched from Hickes’s Hall to the Privy
Council; and that to preserve the decorum of authority, this person had
then been sent to his house: for the effrontery of surrendering himself
was by his prosecutors and their partisans thought intolerable.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account