The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 03 (of 12)Hazlitt, William
General
The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 03 (of 12)
Hazlitt, William
English essays -- 19th century
whispers; no understanding but of his interest; no passion but his
vanity. And yet they would persuade us that this non-entity is
somebody—‘the chief dread of Jacobins and Jacobinism, or quacks and
quackery.’ If so, Jacobins and Jacobinism have not much to fear; and Mr.
Coleridge may publish as many Lay Sermons as he pleases.
There is but one statement in the article in _The Courier_ to which we
can heartily assent; it is Mr. Southey’s prediction of the fate of the
French Revolution. ‘The Temple of Despotism,’ he said, ‘would be
rebuilt, like that of the Mexican God, with human skulls, and cemented
with human blood.’ He has lived to see this; to assist in the
accomplishment of his prophecy, and to consecrate the spectre-building
with pensioned hands!
A LETTER TO WILLIAM SMITH, ESQ., M.P. _from_ Robert Southey, _Esq._ John
Murray, Albemarle-street. 1817. _Price_ 2_s._
_May 4, 1817._
This is very unlike Mr. Burke’s celebrated ‘Letter to the Duke of
Bedford.’ The last is the only work of the Irish orator and patriot, in
which he was in earnest, and all that he wanted was sincerity. The
attack made upon his pension, by rousing his self-love, kindled his
imagination, and made him blaze out in a torrent of fiery eloquence, in
the course of which his tilting prose-Pegasus darted upon the titles of
the noble duke like a thunderbolt, reversed his ancestral honours,
overturned the monstrous straddle-legged figure of that legitimate
monarch, Henry VIII., exploded the mines of the French revolution,
kicked down the Abbé Sieyes’s pigeon-holes full of constitutions, and
only reposed from his whirling career, in that fine retrospect on
himself, and the affecting episode to Admiral Keppel. Mr. Burke was an
apostate, ‘a malignant renegado,’ like Mr. Southey; but there the
comparison ends. He would not have been content, on such an occasion as
the present, with _Mistering_ his opponent, and _Esquiring_ himself,
like the ladies in the Beggar’s Opera, who express the height of their
rankling envy and dislike, by calling each other—_Madam_. Mr. Southey’s
self-love, when challenged to the lists, does not launch out into the
wide field of wit or argument: it retires into its own littleness,
collects all its slender resources in one poor effort of pert,
pettifogging spite, makes up by studied malice for conscious impotence,
and attempts to mortify others by the angry sense of his own
insignificance. He grows tenacious of his ridiculous pretensions, in
proportion as they are given up by every body else. His self-complacency
riots, with a peculiar and pointed gusto, in the universal contempt or
compassion of friends and foes. In the last stage of a galloping
consumption, while the last expiring puff of _The Courier_ makes ‘a
swan-like end,’ in a compliment to his opponents, he is sanguine of a
deathless reputation—considers his soreness to the least touch as a
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account