The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 03 (of 12)Hazlitt, William
General
The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 03 (of 12)
Hazlitt, William
English essays -- 19th century
With respect to the changes which have taken place at home, his Lordship
failed in making the necessity for them clear to our understandings. We
cannot assent to the accuracy of his statements, or the soundness of his
logic. He has suspended the laws of the country to save us from the
danger of anarchy! We deny the danger, and deprecate the remedy. If
ministers could afford to fan the flame of insurrection, to _alarm_ the
country into a surrender of its liberties, we contend that a danger that
could be thus tampered with, thus made a convenient pretence for seizing
a power beyond the law to put it down, might have been put down _without
a power beyond the law_. If a Government’s conspiring against itself
were a sufficient ground for arming it with arbitrary power, no country
could for a moment be safe against ministerial treachery and
encroachment, against real despotism founded on pretended disaffection.
Government would be in perpetual convulsions and affected hysterics,
like a fine lady who wants to domineer over her credulous husband. We
deny that disaffection existed, except that kind which arose from
extreme distress. Hunger is not disloyalty. Nor can we admit that a
Government’s having reduced a country to a state of unparalleled
distress, and consequent desperation, is a reason for giving
_carte-blanche_ to the Government, and putting the people under military
execution. At this rate, the worse the Government, the more firmly it
ought to be rooted: the greater the abuse of confidence, the more blind
and unlimited the confidence ought to be: and any administration need
only bring a nation to the brink of ruin, in order to have a right to
plunge it into the depths of slavery. It is easy to keep the peace with
the sword;—more flattering to the pride of power to crush resistance to
oppression, than to remove the causes of it. To reduce a people to the
alternative of rebellion or of arbitrary sway, does not require the
talents of a great statesman. If Lord Castlereagh claims the merit of
having reduced us to that alternative, we shall not dispute it with him:
whatever may be the result, we cannot thank him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account