The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 03 (of 12)Hazlitt, William
General
The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 03 (of 12)
Hazlitt, William
English essays -- 19th century
The war, as it was carried on from the first by the Pitt-school, and as
they would now revive it, was not a national quarrel, but a question
about a political principle. It had no more to do with France or England
as geographical denominations, than the wars between the Guelphs and
Gibelines. It was not a war of mercantile advantage, or a trial of
strength between two countries, which must be decided by the turn of
events, by the probable calculation of loss and profit, but a war
against an opinion, which could, therefore, never cease, but with the
extirpation of that opinion. Hence there could be neither safety, nor
honour, nor justice, in any terms of peace with the French government,
because, by the supposition, it was not with its power or its conduct,
but with its existence, that we were at war. Hence the impossibility of
maintaining the relations of peace and amity with France. Hence Mr.
Burke’s regicide war. Hence the ridiculousness asserted by _The
Courier_, of even attempting negociation with this hated power. Hence
the various and contradictory aspects which the war assumed after its
first outset, and all of which answered the purpose equally well,
because there was another pivot on which the whole turned, the
sheet-anchor which never loosed its hold, and which enabled ‘the pilot
to weather the storm.’ It was not a temporary or local question of the
boundaries, the possessions, or particular rights of rival states, but a
question, in which all states are at all times equally interested, of
the internal right of any people to choose its own form of government.
Whether this was a just ground of war or not, is another question; but
it was the true one—that which gave its character to the war, and
accounts for all its consequences. It was a war of proscription against
a great and powerful state, for having set the example of a people
ridding itself of an odious and despicable tyranny. It was the question
of the balance of power between kings and people; a question, compared
with which the balance of power in Europe is petty and insignificant.
That what we have here stated, are the real and paramount grounds of
this bloody and inveterate contest in the minds of the war-faction is,
what we apprehend they will not, in their present state of frenzy, deny.
They are the only ones that always survive the shock of accident and the
fluctuation of circumstances, and which are always recurred to when all
others fail, and are constantly avowed in the face of day, whenever the
least probability of success attends them. It has been declared again
and again, month after month, and year after year, that no peace should
be made with France till the last remaining effort had been tried to
attain this object. We were to bury ourselves with our great
war-minister, under the ruins of the civilized world, sooner than relax
in our exertions, or recede from our object. No sacrifices were to be
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account