The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 05 (of 12)Hazlitt, William
General
The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 05 (of 12)
Hazlitt, William
English essays -- 19th century
‘May one have the sight of such a fellow for nothing? Doth there
breathe such an egregious ass? Is there such a foolish animal in
_rerum natura_? How is it possible such a simplicity can exist? Let us
not lose our laughing at him, for God’s sake; let folly’s sceptre
light upon him, and to the ship of fools with him instantly.
_Dondolo._ Of all these follies I arrest your grace.’
Molière has built a play on nearly the same foundation, which is not
much superior to the present. Marston, among other topics of satire, has
a fling at the pseudo-critics and philosophers of his time, who were
‘full of wise saws and modern instances.’ Thus he freights his Ship of
Fools:
‘_Dondolo._ Yes, yes; but they got a supersedeas; all of them proved
themselves either knaves or madmen, and so were let go: there’s none
left now in our ship but a few citizens that let their wives keep
their shop-books, some philosophers, and a few critics; one of which
critics has lost his flesh with fishing at the measure of Plautus’
verses; another has vowed to get the consumption of the lungs, or to
leave to posterity the true orthography and pronunciation of laughing.
_Hercules._ But what philosophers ha’ ye?
_Dondolo._ Oh very strange fellows; one knows nothing, dares not aver
he lives, goes, sees, feels.
_Nymphadoro._ A most insensible philosopher.
_Dondolo._ Another, that there is no present time; and that one man
to-day and to-morrow, is not the same man; so that he that yesterday
owed money, to-day owes none; because he is not the same man.
_Herod._ Would that philosophy hold good in law?
_Hercules._ But why has the Duke thus laboured to have all the fools
shipped out of his dominions?
_Dondolo._ Marry, because he would play the fool alone without any
rival.’
_Act IV._
Molière has enlarged upon the same topic in his _Mariage Forcé_, but not
with more point or effect. Nymphadoro’s reasons for devoting himself to
the sex generally, and Hercules’s description of the different
qualifications of different men, will also be found to contain excellent
specimens, both of style and matter.—The disguise of Hercules as the
Fawn, is assumed voluntarily, and he is comparatively a calm and
dispassionate observer of the times. Malevole’s disguise in the
Malcontent has been forced upon him by usurpation and injustice, and his
invectives are accordingly more impassioned and virulent. His satire
does not ‘like a wild goose fly, unclaimed of any man,’ but has a bitter
and personal application. Take him in the words of the usurping Duke’s
account of him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account