The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 05 (of 12)Hazlitt, William
General
The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 05 (of 12)
Hazlitt, William
English essays -- 19th century
Of Donne I know nothing but some beautiful verses to his wife,
dissuading her from accompanying him on his travels abroad, and some
quaint riddles in verse, which the Sphinx could not unravel.
Waller still lives in the name of Sacharissa; and his lines on the death
of Oliver Cromwell shew that he was a man not without genius and
strength of thought.
Marvel is a writer of nearly the same period, and worthy of a better
age. Some of his verses are harsh, as the words of Mercury; others
musical, as is Apollo’s lute. Of the latter kind are his boat-song, his
description of a fawn, and his lines to Lady Vere. His lines prefixed to
Paradise Lost are by no means the most favourable specimen of his
powers.
Butler’s Hudibras is a poem of more wit than any other in the language.
The rhymes have as much genius in them as the thoughts; but there is no
story in it, and but little humour. Humour is the making others act or
talk absurdly and unconsciously: wit is the pointing out and ridiculing
that absurdity consciously, and with more or less ill-nature. The fault
of Butler’s poem is not that it has too much wit, but that it has not an
equal quantity of other things. One would suppose that the starched
manners and sanctified grimace of the times in which he lived, would of
themselves have been sufficiently rich in ludicrous incidents and
characters; but they seem rather to have irritated his spleen, than to
have drawn forth his powers of picturesque imitation. Certainly if we
compare Hudibras with Don Quixote in this respect, it seems rather a
meagre and unsatisfactory performance.
Rochester’s poetry is the poetry of wit combined with the love of
pleasure, of thought with licentiousness. His extravagant heedless
levity has a sort of passionate enthusiasm in it; his contempt for every
thing that others respect, almost amounts to sublimity. His poem upon
Nothing is itself no trifling work. His epigrams were the bitterest, the
least laboured, and the truest, that ever were written.
Sir John Suckling was of the same mercurial stamp, but with a greater
fund of animal spirits; as witty, but less malicious. His Ballad on a
Wedding is perfect in its kind, and has a spirit of high enjoyment in
it, of sportive fancy, a liveliness of description, and a truth of
nature, that never were surpassed. It is superior to either Gay or
Prior; for with all their _naïveté_ and terseness, it has a Shakspearian
grace and luxuriance about it, which they could not have reached.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account