The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 08 (of 12)Hazlitt, William
General
The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 08 (of 12)
Hazlitt, William
English essays -- 19th century
The Tartuffe, the original of the Hypocrite, is a play that we do not
very well understand. Still less do we understand the Hypocrite, which
is taken from it. In the former, the glaring improbability of the plot,
the absurdity of a man’s imposing on the credulity of another in spite
of the evidence of his senses, and without any proof of the sincerity of
a religious charlatan but his own professions, is carried off by long
formal speeches and dull pompous casuistry. We find our patience tired
out, and our understanding perplexed, as if we were sitting by in a
court of law. If there is nothing of nature, at least there is enough of
art, in the French play. But in the Hypocrite (we mean the principal
character itself), there is neither the one nor the other. Tartuffe is a
plausible, fair-spoken, long-winded knave, who if he does not convince,
confounds his auditors.
In the Hypocrite of Bickerstaff, the insidious, fawning, sophistical,
accomplished French Abbé is modernised into a low-lived, canting,
impudent Methodist preacher; and this was the character which Mr. Dowton
represented, we must say, too well. Dr. Cantwell is a sturdy beggar, and
nothing more: he is not an impostor, but a bully. There is not in any
thing that he says or does, in his looks, words or actions, the least
reason that Sir John Lambert should admit him into his house and
friendship, suffer him to make love to his wife and daughter, disinherit
his son in his favour, and refuse to listen to any insinuation or proof
offered against the virtue and piety of his treacherous inmate. In the
manners and institutions of the old French _regime_, there was something
to account for the blind ascendancy acquired by the good priest over his
benefactor, who might have submitted to be cuckolded, robbed, cheated,
and insulted, as a tacit proof of his religion and loyalty. The
inquisitorial power exercised by the Church was then so great, that a
man who refused, to be priest-ridden, might very soon be suspected of
designs against the state. This is at least the best account we can give
of the tameness of Orgon. But in this country, nothing of the kind could
happen. A fellow like Dr. Cantwell could only have got admittance into
the kitchen of Sir John Lambert—or to the ear of old Lady Lambert. The
animal magnetism of such spiritual guides, is with us directed against
the weaker nerves of our female devotees.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account