The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 11 (of 12)Hazlitt, William
Philosophy
The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 11 (of 12)
Hazlitt, William
English essays -- 19th century
Such is the outline of this author’s account of the intellect, which,
after all, appears to be rather dogmatical than demonstrative. He is
much more intent on raising an extensive and magnificent fabric, than on
laying the foundations. Each part does not rest upon its own separate
basis, but, like the workmanship of some lofty arch, is supported and
rivetted to its place by the weight and regular balance of the whole.
Kant does not appear to trouble himself about the evidence of any
particular proposition, but to rely on the conformity and mutual
correspondence of the different parts of his general system, and its
sufficiency, if admitted, to explain all the phenomena of the human
intellect with consistency and accuracy;—in the same manner as the
decypherer infers that he has found the true key of the hieroglyphic
hand-writing, when he is able to solve every difficulty by it. However
profound and comprehensive we may allow the views of human nature
unfolded by this philosopher to be, his method is necessarily defective
in simplicity, clearness, and force. His reasoning is seldom any thing
more than a detailed, paraphrased explanation of his original statement,
instead of being (what it ought to be) an appeal to known facts, or a
deduction from acknowledged principles, or a detection of the
inconsistencies of other writers. The extreme involution and
technicality of his style proceed from the same source; that is, from
the necessity of adapting a conventional language to the artificial and
arbitrary arrangement of his ideas. The whole of Kant’s system is
evidently an elaborate antithesis or contradiction to the modern
philosophy, and yet it is by no means a real approximation to popular
opinion. Its chief object is to oppose certain fundamental principles to
the _empirical_ or mechanical philosophy, and it either rejects or
explains away the more common and established notions, except so far as
they coincide with the rigid theory of the author. He sets out with a
preconceived hypothesis; and all other facts and opinions are made to
bend to a predominant purpose.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account