The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 12 (of 12)Hazlitt, William
General
The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 12 (of 12)
Hazlitt, William
English essays -- 19th century
I remember an absurd instance enough of this deliberate mode of setting
to work in a young French artist, who was copying the Titian’s
_Mistress_ in the Louvre, some twenty years ago. After getting in his
chalk-outline, one would think he might have been attracted to the
face—that heaven of beauty (as it appears to some), clear, transparent,
open, breathing freshness, that ‘makes a sunshine in the shady place’;
or to the lustre of the golden hair; or some part of the poetry of the
picture (for, with all its materiality, this picture has a poetry about
it); instead of which he began to finish a square he had marked out in
the right-hand corner of the picture, containing a piece of board and a
bottle of some kind of ointment. He set to work like a cabinet-maker or
an engraver, and appeared to have no sympathy with the soul of the
picture. On a Frenchman (generally speaking), the distinction between
the great and the little, the exquisite and the indifferent, is in a
great measure lost: his self-satisfied egotism supplies whatever is
wanting up to a certain point, and neutralizes whatever goes beyond it.
Another young man, at the time I speak of, was for eleven weeks daily
employed in making a black-lead pencil drawing of a small Leonardo: he
sat with his legs balanced across a rail to do it, kept his hat on,
every now and then consulted with his friends about his progress, rose
up, went to the fire to warm himself, talked of the styles of the
different masters—praising Titian _pour les coloris_, Raphael _pour
l’expression_, Poussin _pour la composition_—all being alike to him,
provided they had each something to help him on in his harangue (for
that was all he thought about),—and then returned to _perfectionate_ (as
he called it) his copy. This would drive an Englishman out of his
senses, supposing him to be ever so stupid. The perseverance and the
interruptions, the labour without impulse, the attention to the parts in
succession, and disregard of the whole together, are to him utterly
incomprehensible. He wants to do something striking, and bends all his
thoughts and energies to one mighty effort. A Frenchman has no notion of
this summary proceeding, exists mostly in his present sensations, and,
if he is left at liberty to enjoy or trifle with these, cares about
nothing farther, looking neither backwards nor forwards. They forgot the
reign of terror under Robespierre in a month; they forgot that they had
ever been called the _great nation_ under Buonaparte in a week. They sat
in chairs on the Boulevards (just as they do at other times), when the
shots were firing into the next street, and were only persuaded to quit
them when their own soldiers were seen pouring down all the avenues from
the heights of Montmartre, crying ‘_Sauve qui peut!_’ They then went
home and dressed themselves to see the _Allies_ enter Paris, as a fine
sight, just as they would witness a procession at a theatre. This is
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account