“If you are conscientious and give your conclusions against the powers
that be, you are lost,” continued she. “Now, at this moment, you might
turn your position to account to make a fine match that would put you
above unlucky chances for the rest of your life; you may marry a wife
with fortune sufficient to land you on the bench, in the magistrature
assise. There is a fine chance for you. M. du Croisier will never have
any children; everybody knows why. His money, and his wife’s as well,
will go to his niece, Mlle. Duval. M. Duval is an ironmaster, his purse
is tolerably filled, to begin with, and his father is still alive, and
has a little property besides. The father and son have a million of
francs between them; they will double it with du Croisier’s help, for
du Croisier has business connections among great capitalists and
manufacturers in Paris. M. and Mme. Duval the younger would be certain
to give their daughter to a suitor brought forward by du Croisier, for
he is sure to leave two fortunes to his niece; and, in all probability,
he will settle the reversion of his wife’s property upon Mlle. Duval in
the marriage contract, for Mme. du Croisier has no kin. You know how du
Croisier hates the d’Esgrignons. Do him a service, be his man, take
up this charge of forgery which he is going to make against young
d’Esgrignon, and follow up the proceedings at once without consulting
the public prosecutor at Paris. And, then, pray Heaven that the Ministry
dismisses you for doing your office impartially, in spite of the powers
that be; for if they do, your fortune is made! You will have a charming
wife and thirty thousand francs a year with her, to say nothing of four
millions expectations in ten years’ time.”
In two evenings Sauvager was talked over. Both he and the President kept
the affair a secret from old Blondet, from Michu, and from the second
member of the staff of prosecuting counsel. Feeling sure of Blondet’s
impartiality on a question of fact, the President made certain of
a majority without counting Camusot. And now Camusot’s unexpected
defection had thrown everything out. What the President wanted was a
committal for trial before the public prosecutor got warning. How if
Camusot or the second counsel for the prosecution should send word to
Paris?
And here some portion of Camusot’s private history may perhaps explain
how it came to pass that Chesnel took it for granted that the examining
magistrate would be on the d’Esgrignons’ side, and how he had the
boldness to tamper in the open street with that representative of
justice.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account