The Colored Man in the Methodist Episcopal ChurchHagood, L. M. (Lewis Marshall)
History
The Colored Man in the Methodist Episcopal Church
Hagood, L. M. (Lewis Marshall)
African American Methodists; Methodist Episcopal Church
benevolent societies have no knowledge of it. The _Church of God will
never require such a test_. Were the Methodist Church to do it, Satan
would certainly be warranted in affirming that a dollar in her scales
weighs more than an immortal soul.
The crisis in the question of a colored bishop came May 20th, when
Report No. 3 of the Committee on Episcopacy was presented, as follows:
“The Committee on Episcopacy, having considered the memorials
and petitions referred to it on the election of a bishop of
African descent, adopted each of the following resolutions by a
vote of thirty-nine to eight:
“_Resolved_, 1. That the best interests of our Church in
general, and of our colored people in particular, require that
one or more of our general superintendents should be of African
descent.
“_Resolved_, 2. That we recommend that this General Conference
elect one bishop of African descent.”
J. S. Smart moved to adopt; thereupon Alfred Wheeler presented the
following minority report, and moved that it be substituted for the
report of the majority:
“A portion of your Committee on Episcopacy, differing widely
from the majority, both as to the necessity and expediency of
electing a colored bishop at the present time, feel constrained
to express our dissent by a minority report. After listening
attentively to prolonged discussions upon the subject, and
giving due weight to the arguments urged in its favor, and to
full representation of the state of our religious work among the
colored people of the South, representations made by themselves
as well as by their white co-laborers, we are convinced that
sound policy forbids the adoption of the recommendation of the
majority.
“_Resolved_, therefore, That we deem it inexpedient to elect any
more bishops at this General Conference.”
John Lanahan moved that the whole subject be indefinitely postponed. On
motion of Emperor Williams, the yeas and nays were called, and the
motion to postpone indefinitely was carried by two hundred and
twenty-eight votes to one hundred and thirty-seven.
To show the interest manifested, of the three hundred and ninety-nine
delegates, all were present and voted on that resolution save
thirty-four. At page 282 of General Conference Journal of 1880 we have
the list of names. There appear names of persons who voted indefinitely
to postpone that question that surprises us a little; and not very much,
either. However, a quietus was thus put upon that question for _that
session at least_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account