The Colored Man in the Methodist Episcopal ChurchHagood, L. M. (Lewis Marshall)
History
The Colored Man in the Methodist Episcopal Church
Hagood, L. M. (Lewis Marshall)
African American Methodists; Methodist Episcopal Church
To the General Conference of 1880 there was presented a memorial from
“the leading educators (fifty in number) in our white schools in the
South,” asking that the work of the Freedmen’s Aid Society be extended
so as to aid the schools of the Church in the South where only white
pupils attended. No special emphasis was put upon the matter, save that
of “aiding” the above-named schools. The Committee on Freedmen’s Aid
Work in the South carefully considered the subject, and reported to that
conference as follows:
“Your Committee on Freedmen’s Aid and Southern Work respectfully
report:
“1. That, in its judgment, the present organization of the
Freedmen’s Aid Society should remain unchanged.
“2. That under the phrase ‘and others’ of Article II, in the
Constitution of the Freedmen’s Aid Society, we see the way clear
to aid the schools which have been established by our Church in
the Southern States among the white people, and hereby ask the
General Conference to recommend to the Board of Managers of this
society to give such aid to these schools during the next
quadrennium as can be done without embarrassment to the schools
among the freedmen.”
As soon as the report was read, considerable feeling was apparent. The
question had hitherto seemed of small importance. While the report was
pending the feeling manifest found vent in “a motion to appropriate
twenty-five per cent of all moneys raised by the Freedmen’s Aid Society
to schools among the whites.” It was laid on the table. After this there
seemed a determination to separate, if possible, the educational work of
the Church in the South among the whites from that of the blacks. Rev.
A. J. Kynett, therefore, offered the following as a substitute for the
second item:
“_Resolved_, That the Board of Education be, and is hereby,
instructed to make such provisions as may be necessary and
practicable for the aid of our educational institutions in the
South not aided by the Freedmen’s Aid Society.”
Had this substitute been accepted, we certainly would have had two
separate and distinct educational societies within the Church; the
Educational Society would have been so burdened as to have had to
withdraw, to a certain extent, from the plan of aiding indigent students
as hitherto, or increase its resources. That, at any rate, to have thus
burdened it would have crippled, if not killed it, is suspected. That
substitute was covered by the following as a substitute for the whole:
“_Resolved_, That in the judgment of this General Conference the
present organization and perpetuity of the Freedmen’s Aid
Society should remain unchanged.”
But both these substitutes were laid on the table. The other extreme
view was manifested by the following substitute, which went the way of
the preceding:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account