The Colored Man in the Methodist Episcopal ChurchHagood, L. M. (Lewis Marshall)
History
The Colored Man in the Methodist Episcopal Church
Hagood, L. M. (Lewis Marshall)
African American Methodists; Methodist Episcopal Church
“The adoption of this report, as narrated above, leaves no room
for a doubt as to the position of the General Conference on the
question of caste. There is no conflict between the two reports.
The report from the Freedmen’s Committee is to be interpreted in
the light of the report from the Committee on the State of the
Church.
“The attempt made by certain persons to make the impression that
the latest deliverance of the General Conference was hasty and
not well considered, is hardly less than a perversion of the
facts in the case. Being the latest, it is the _mature_ judgment
of that body, and was intended to set at rest the question of
caste.
“It is passing strange that any attempt should be made,
particularly by members of the late General Conference, to
justify the course pursued by the Chattanooga trustees. They
have simply violated both the letter and the spirit of the
deliverance of the Church through its only legislative body.
There was but one thing, therefore, that the Freedmen’s Aid
Society could do without joining hands with the Chattanooga
trustees; namely, to condemn their policy of rejecting colored
students; and that, thank God, it has done. Let its resolution
be engraved in letters of gold, and conspicuously displayed over
the doors of all the schools under its care. Let it be announced
boldly by bishops, editors, college faculties, and ministers,
that the Methodist Episcopal Church knows no caste, either in
its houses of worship or schools of learning.
“Now that this vexed question is settled, so far as it is
possible to settle it by the action of the Freedmen’s Aid
Society, and settled in harmony with the action of the General
Conference and the teachings of the New Testament, let the
support of the society be more generous than ever before. There
is no cause that is more worthy, and when its merits are fairly
stated it can not fail to meet a generous response.”
The following appeared in the _Western Christian Advocate_ of same date,
written by Isaac Crook, D.D.:
“‘You can and you can’t,
You shall and you sha’n’t.’
“Allow a word now from one outside of the responsibilities of
General Conference membership in 1884, and of ambitions for
1888, and with no votes to be defended. The action had on the
report (No. 3) from the Freedmen’s Aid Committee seemed to
outsiders to say, ‘That action is inspired by the prudence come
from experience, and through those ‘on the ground.’’ It is in
harmony with the liberty needful in all similar work North and
South, and is sustained by the Pauline wisdom which ‘took and
circumcised Timothy because of the Jews in those quarters.’
Local prejudices did control the ‘policy’ of St. Paul.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account