The Colored Man in the Methodist Episcopal ChurchHagood, L. M. (Lewis Marshall)
History
The Colored Man in the Methodist Episcopal Church
Hagood, L. M. (Lewis Marshall)
African American Methodists; Methodist Episcopal Church
With the understanding that we are not cumbersome to the Church, what is
the duty of the colored members therein? It is our indispensable duty to
remain loyal, wise, and prudent. By saying that the colored members of
the Methodist Episcopal Church ought to remain loyal, does not
necessarily carry with it a thought that there is a spirit of disloyalty
brewing. What is intended is simply that each and every member thereof
should know his and her obligations to the Church, her rules and
regulations, and sacredly keep them, “not for wrath, but for conscience’
sake.” If the entire membership would be loyal and stay loyal, as well
as appear loyal in the eyes of the world and of the Church, it must see
to it that there is no just ground for such complaints against the race
as have herein before been mentioned as found in Mr. Wright’s book. The
charges he brought forward were, that the colored delegates to the
General Conference of 1884 were “generally very ignorant
representatives.” He said also: “It is said, by those who know and judge
impartially, that to-day there are but few men in any of the Southern
colored and mixed conferences who are fitted for their places, and that
the colored members are still grossly immoral.” These are _awfully_
serious charges, whether true or not. A great many people in these
United States will probably form (or may have already) an opinion from
that book of not only the race with which they anon come in contact in
the busy scenes of every-day life, but of the colored membership of the
Methodist Episcopal Church, members of the same Christian family, who
are privileged to eat at the same Lord’s table. We know there are
thousands of chances for _even us_ to say, “It is not all on this side
of the house;” but it makes but little, if anything, in our favor if
others are no better than we. That the good brother overleaped the
bounds of reason, not to say common sense, in his desperation to make
out a case, is a foregone conclusion. What he says is, that “those who
know and judge impartially,” say “that the colored members are still
grossly immoral.” What a fearful charge is this against the bishops of
our Church, that they have brought into the Church, directly or
indirectly, under their very noses, _three hundred thousand_ “grossly
immoral” members! Thousands of these have received authority to preach
the gospel and administer the sacrament of the Lord’s Supper; none of
whom have been less than two years under the almost personal training of
the General Conference. Isn’t it horrible? Who believes it? But no one
need be surprised at this tirade against the poor “black man,” for in
his next paragraph above, at page 265, brother Wright, in speaking of
the white ministers and agents sent South to teach the colored people,
says: “The general impudence and lack of knowledge of the agents and
ministers sent to the South have blocked up the way of the Church. The
_immoral character_ and the dishonest practices of some inflicted
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account