The Colored Man in the Methodist Episcopal ChurchHagood, L. M. (Lewis Marshall)
History
The Colored Man in the Methodist Episcopal Church
Hagood, L. M. (Lewis Marshall)
African American Methodists; Methodist Episcopal Church
Let us now examine the above resolutions more closely.
Blessings seldom come unattended. At a glance any one can see that the
requests of the colored members had been granted. Henceforth they were
to have (1) colored pastorates, the very thing for which they had
prayed. No one doubts, we think, that the granting of that very thing
gave birth to all the other race questions that do or may arise touching
the relations of the two races within the Church. The wisdom of that
General Conference peered away out into the future. It probably saw a
time when advanced ideas would lead men within the Church to advanced
work. These pastorates created by that General Conference were to be for
“colored people.” They were to be allowed (2) separate conferences.
There was no way to avoid them where there were “colored pastorates for
colored people.” Just so. These separate conferences, however, were (3)
“not to impair existing rights of our colored members, nor yet (4) to
forbid the transfer of white ministers to said conferences where it may
be practicable and deemed necessary.” What “existing rights” had colored
members? To remain in any Church they chose within Methodism, or join
with and worship in any congregation within the Methodist Episcopal
Church. It did not stop there, but action was taken looking to the
education of the race. The General Conference Committee on Education
reported as follows:
“The committee have had before them the memorial of Rev. J. F.
Wright in reference to the Wilberforce University, and, in view
of its peculiar character and relation to the Church, we offer
for adoption the following resolution:
“_Resolved_, That we heartily sympathize with the noble purpose
contemplated in the establishment of Wilberforce University and
we do hereby earnestly commend the institution to the prayers
and liberal contributions of the friends of humanity.”
Just what “the peculiar character and relation” were, is not stated. It
may have been that the enterprise was sprung upon the Church before it
had been duly authorized. It may have been that its “peculiar character
and relation” meant that it was to be exclusively colored. It makes no
difference as to what was meant, some way or other that institution soon
passed into other hands.
[Illustration:
BENNETT SEMINARY, GREENSBORO, N.C.
]
Again, it would have been folly to grant separate conferences for the
colored membership and leave standing the old rule, and allow it to
apply in this case, requiring a probation of two years before being
admitted to an annual conference. This was brought forward at once, and
the animus of the General Conference on the subject was at once
manifested by the following resolution:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account