The Commerce and Navigation of the Erythræan Sea: Being a Translation of the Periplus Maris Erythræi, by an Anonymous Writer, and of Arrian's Account of the Voyage of Nearkhos, from the Mouth of the Indus to the Head of the Persian Gulf
History
The Commerce and Navigation of the Erythræan Sea: Being a Translation of the Periplus Maris Erythræi, by an Anonymous Writer, and of Arrian's Account of the Voyage of Nearkhos, from the Mouth of the Indus to the Head of the Persian Gulf
Classical geography; Geography, Ancient; India -- Description and travel -- Early works to 1800; Indian Ocean Region -- Commerce -- History
Beyond these islands occurs, after a voyage of two days and two
nights, the island of +Menouthias+ or +Menouthesias+, which
it has been found difficult to identify with any certainty. “It is,”
says Vincent, “the _Eitenediommenouthesias_ of the _Periplûs_, a term
egregiously strange and corrupted, but out of which the commentators
unanimously collect Menoothias, whatever may be the fate of the
remaining syllables. That this Menoothias,” he continues, “must have
been one of the Zangibar islands is indubitable; for the distance
from the coast of all three, Pemba, Zangibar, and Momfia, affords
a character which is indelible; a character applicable to no other
island from Guardafui to Madagascar.” He then identifies it with the
island of Zangibar, lat. 6° 5´ S., in preference to Pemba, 5° 6´ S.,
which lay too far out of the course, and in preference to Momfia, 7°
50´ S. (though more doubtfully), because of its being by no means
conspicuous, whereas Zangibar was so prominent and obvious above
the other two, that it might well attract the particular attention
of navigators, and its distance from the mainland is at the same
time so nearly in accordance with that given in the _Periplûs_ as to
counterbalance all other objections. A writer in Smith’s _Classical
Geography_, who seems to have overlooked the indications of the
distances both of Ptolemy and the _Periplûs_, assigns it a position
much further to the north than is reconcilable with these distances.
He places it about a degree south from the mouth of the River Juba or
Govind, just where an opening in the coral-reefs is now found. “The
coasting voyage,” he says, “steering S. W., reached the island on
the east side—a proof that it was close to the main.... It is true
the navigator says it was 300 stadia from the mainland; but as there
is no reason to suppose that he surveyed the island, this distance
must be taken to signify the estimated width of the northern inlet
separating the island from the main, and this estimate is probably
much exaggerated. The mode of fishing with baskets is still practised
in the Juba islands and along this coast. The formation of the coast
of E. Africa in these latitudes—where the hills or downs upon the
coast are all formed of a coral conglomerate comprising fragments of
madrepore, shell and sand, renders it likely that the island which was
close to the main 16 or 17 centuries ago, should now be united to it.
Granting this theory of gradual transformation of the coast-line, the
+Menouthias+ of the _Periplûs_ may be supposed to have stood in
what is now the rich garden-land of +Shamba+, where the rivers
carrying down mud to mingle with the marine deposit of coral drift
covered the choked-up estuary with a rich soil.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account