The Commerce and Navigation of the Erythræan Sea: Being a Translation of the Periplus Maris Erythræi, by an Anonymous Writer, and of Arrian's Account of the Voyage of Nearkhos, from the Mouth of the Indus to the Head of the Persian Gulf
History
The Commerce and Navigation of the Erythræan Sea: Being a Translation of the Periplus Maris Erythræi, by an Anonymous Writer, and of Arrian's Account of the Voyage of Nearkhos, from the Mouth of the Indus to the Head of the Persian Gulf
Classical geography; Geography, Ancient; India -- Description and travel -- Early works to 1800; Indian Ocean Region -- Commerce -- History
(32) Returning to the mainland the narrative conducts us next to
+Moskha+, a seaport trading with +Kanê+, and a wintering
place for vessels arriving late in the season from Malabar and the
Gulf of Khambât. The distance of this place from Suagros is set down
at upwards of 1,100 stadia, 600 of which represent the breadth of a
bay which begins at the Cape, and is called +Omana Al-Kamar+.
The occurrence of the two names Omana and Moskha in such close
connexion led D’Anville to suppose that +Moskha+ is identical
with +Maskat+, the capital of +Oman+, the country lying
at the south-east extremity of Arabia, and hence that Ras-el-Ḥad,
beyond which Maskat lies, must be Cape Suagros. This supposition is,
however, untenable, since the identification of Moskha with the modern
+Ausera+ is complete. For, in the first place, the Bay of Seger,
which begins at Cape Fartak, is of exactly the same measurement
across to Cape Thurbot Ali as the Bay of +Omana+, and again the
distance from Cape Thurbot Ali [lat. 16° 38´ N., long. 53° 3´ E.]
to Ras-al-Sair, the +Ausara+ of Ptolemy, corresponds almost as
exactly to the distance assigned by our author from the same Cape to
+Moskha+. Moreover Pliny (XII. 35) notices that one particular
kind of incense bore the name of _Ausaritis_, and, as the _Periplûs_
states that +Moskha+ was the great emporium of the incense trade,
the identification is satisfactory.
There was another Moskha on this coast which was also a port. It lay
to the west of Suagros, and has been identified with +Koshîn+
[lat. 15° 21´ N. long. 51° 39´ E.]. Our author, though correct in his
description of the coast, may perhaps have erred in his nomenclature;
and this is the more likely to have happened as it scarcely admits
of doubt that he had no personal knowledge of South Arabia beyond
+Kanê+ and Cape +Suagros+. Besides no other author speaks
of an Omana so far to westward as the position assigned to the Bay of
that name. The tract immediately beyond +Moskha+ or Ausera is
low and fertile, and is called +Dofar+ or +Zhafâr+, after
a famous city now destroyed, but whose ruins are still to be traced
between Al-hâfâh and Addahariz. “This Dhafâr,” says Yule (_Marco Polo_
II. p. 442 note) “or the bold fountain above it, is supposed to be the
+Sephar+ of _Genesis_ X. 30.” It is certain that the Himyarites
had spread their dominion as far eastward as this place. Marco Polo
thus describes Dhafâr:—“It stands upon the sea, and has a very good
haven, so that there is a great traffic of shipping between this and
India; and the merchants take hence great numbers of Arab horses to
that market, making great profits thereby.... Much white incense is
produced here, and I will tell you how it grows. The trees are like
small fir-trees; these are notched with a knife in several places, and
from these notches the incense is exuded. Sometimes, also, it flows
from the tree without any notch, this is by reason of the great heat
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account