32/4 3 Kent's Comm. (12th ed.), 218; ib. 138, n. 1. 32/5 3 Kent, 218. 32/6 Justin v. Ballam, 1 Salk. 34; S.C. 2 Ld. Raym. 805. 33/1 D. 20. 4. 5 & 6; cf. Livy, XXX. 38. 33/2 Pardessus, Droit. Comm., n. 961. 33/3 3 Keb. 112, 114, citing 1 Roll. Abr. 530. 34/1 Godbolt, 260. 34/2 3 Colquhoun, Roman Civil Law, Section 2196. 35/1 Lex Salica (Merkel), LXXVII.; Ed. Hilperich., Section 5. 36/1 See Lecture III., ad fin. 39/1 Cf. 2 Hawk. P.C. 303 et seq.; 27 Ass. 25. 40/1 2 Palgrave, Commonwealth, cxxx., cxxxi. 41/1 Butler, Sermons, VIII. Bentham, Theory of Legislation (Principles of Penal Code, Part 2, ch. 16), Hildreth's tr., p. 309. 41/2 General View of the Criminal Law of England, p. 99. 43/1 Wharton, Crim. Law, (8th ed.) Section 8, n. 1. 43/2 Ibid., Section 7. 43/3 Even the law recognizes that this is a sacrifice. Commonwealth v. Sawin, 2 Pick. (Mass.) 547, 549. 47/1 Cf. 1 East, P.C. 294; United States v. Holmes, 1 Wall. Jr. 1; 1 Bishop, Crim. Law, Sections 347-349, 845 (6th ed.); 4 Bl. Comm. 31. 51/1 Art. 223. 51/2 General View of the Criminal Law of England, p. 116. 53/1 Harris, Criminal Law, p. 13. 53/2 Steph. Dig. Crim. Law, Art. 223, Illustration (6), and n. 1. 56/1 4 Bl. Comm. 192. 57/1 Cf. 4 Bl. Comm. 197. 58/1 Reg. v. Hibbert, L.R. 1 C.C. 184. 59/1 Reg. v. Prince, L.R. 2 C.C. 154. 59/2 Commonwealth v. Hallett, 103 Mass. 452. 60/1 Stephen, Dig. Cr. Law, Art. 223, Illustr. (5); Foster, 294, 295. 60/2 Cf. Gray's case, cited 2 Strange, 774. 60/3 Steph. Dig., Art. 223, Illustr. (1). 60/4 Steph. Dig., Art. 223, Illustr. (8). 60/5 Rex v. Mastin, 6 C.&P. 396. Cf. Reg. v. Swindall, 2 C. & K. 230. 60/6 4 Bl. Comm. 192. 62/1 Steph. Dig. Cr. Law, Art. 225. 62/2 Rex v. Shaw, 6 C.&P. 372. 62/3 Rex v. Oneby, 2 Strange, 766, 773. 62/4 Rex v. Hayward, 6 C.&P. 157. 63/1 Commonwealth v. Walden, 3 Cush. (Mass.) 558. Cf. Steph. Gen. View of the Crim. Law, 84. 64/1 2 Bishop Crim. Law, Section 14 (6th ed.). 64/2 Glanv., Lib. XIV. c. 4. 64/3 Bract., fol. 146b. 64/4 Ibid. 64/5 2 East, P.C., c. 21, Sections 7, 8, pp. 1027, 1031. 66/1 1 Bishop, Crim. Law, Section 735 (6th ed.). 66/2 Reg. v. Dilworth, 2 Moo. & Rob. 531; Reg. v. Jones, 9 C.&P. 258. The statement that a man is presumed to intend the natural consequences of his acts is a mere fiction disguising the true theory. See Lecture IV. 67/1 Reg. v. Taylor, 1 F. & F. 511. 67/2 Reg. v. Roberts, 25 L. J. M. C. 17; S.C. Dearsly, C., C. 539. 68/1 Lewis v. The State, 35 Ala. 380. 69/1 See M'Pherson's Case, Dearsly & Bell, 197, 201, Bramwell, B. 69/2 Cf. 1 Bishop, Crim. Law, Sections 741-745 (6th ed.). 71/1 2 Bishop, Crim. Law, Section 758 (6th ed.). 73/1 Cf. Stephen, General View of Criminal Law of England, 49 et seq. 73/2 Cf. Stephen, General View, 49-52; 2 East, P.C. 553. 74/1 Rex v. Cabbage, Russ. & Ry. 292. 74/2 Cf. 4 Bl. Comm. 224; Steph. Dig. Crim. Law, Arts. 316, 319. 74/3 Cf. 4 Bl. Comm. 227, 228.