393/1 F. N. B. 128 D, E; Co. Lit. 96 b. It is assumed that, when an obligation is spoken of as falling upon the land, it is understood to be only a figure of speech. Of course rights and obligations are confined to human beings. 393/2 Keilway, 145 b, 146, pl. 15; Sir Henry Nevil's Case, Plowd. 377, 381; Chudleigh's Case, 1 Co. Rep. 119 b, 122 b. 393/3 F. N. B. 180 N.; Co. Lit. 385 a; Spencer's Case, 5 Co. Rep. 16 a, 17 b; Pakenham's Case, Y.B. 42 Ed. III. 3, pl. 14; Keilway, 145 b, 146, pl. 15; Comyns's Digest, Covenant (B, 3). 394/1 Holms v. Seller, 3 Lev. 305; Rowbotham v. Wilson, 8 H. L. C. 348; Bronson v. Coffin, 108 Mass. 175, 180. Cf. Bro. Covenant, pl. 2. 394/2 Y.B. 21 Ed. III. 2, pl. 5; F. N. B. 180 N. 394/3 The action is case in the Prior of Woburn's Case, Y.B. 22 Hen. VI. 46, pl. 36. In F. N. B. 128 E, n. (a), it is said that a curia claudenda only lay upon a prescriptive right, and that if the duty to fence was by indenture the plaintiff was put to his writ of covenant. But see below, pp. 396, 400. 394/4 Y.B. 32 & 33 Ed. I. 430. 395/1 Y.B. 20 Ed. I. 360. 395/2 Y.B. 32 & 33 Ed. I. 516. 395/3 "Quia res cum homine [obviously a misprint for onere] transit ad quemcunque." Fol. 382, 382 b. 395/4 Lib. VI. c. 23, Section 17. 395/5 Pakenham's Case, Y.B. 42 Ed. III. 3, pl. 14. 395/6 Sugd. V. & P. (14th ed.), 587; Rawle, Covenants for Title (4th ed.), p. 314. Cf. Vyvyan v. Arthur, 1 B. & C. 410; Sharp v. Waterhouse, 7 El. & Bl. 816, 823. 396/1 Co. Lit. 385 a. 396/2 Cf. Finchden as to rent in Y. B, 45 Ed. III. 11, 12. 396/3 Cf. Y.B. 50 Ed. III. 12, 13, pl. 2. 397/1 Covenant, pl. 17. 397/2 There is a colon here in both editions of the Year Books, marking the beginning of a new argument. 397/3 Pakenham's Case, Y.B. 42 Ed. III. 3, pl. 14. 398/1 Bro. Covenant, pl. 5. Cf. Spencer's Case, 5 Co. Rep. 16 a, 17 b, 18 a. 398/2 Horne's Case, Y.B. 2 Hen. IV. 6, pl. 25. 399/1 "Quod conceditur." Cf. Spencer's Case, 5 Co. Rep. 16 a, 18 a. 399/2 It was quite possible that two liabilities should exist side by side. Bro. Covenant, pl. 32; Brett v. Cumberland, Cro. Jac. 521, 523. 399/3 1 Co. Rep. 122 b; S.C., sub nom. Dillon v. Fraine, Popham, 70, 71. 400/1 Essays in Ang. Sax. Law, 248. 400/2 Y.B. 22 Ed. I. 494, 496. 400/3 Y.B. 4 Ed. III. 57, pl. 71; S.C., 7 Ed. III. 65, pl. 67. 401/1 Bract., fol. 17 b, 37 b; Fleta, III. c. 14, Section 6; 1 Britton (Nich.), 223, 233, 244, 255, 312; Abbrev. Plac. p. 308, col 2, Dunelm, rot. 43 (33 I.); Y. B, 20 Ed. I. 232; Co. Lit. 384 b. 401/2 Hyde v. Dean of Windsor, Cro. Eliz. 552. 401/3 Spencer's Case, 5 Co. Rep. 16 a. Cf. Minshill v. Oakes, 2 H. & N. 793, 807. 402/1 Hyde v. Dean of Windsor, Cro. Eliz. 552, 553; S.C., ib. 457. Cf. Bally v. Wells, 3 Wilson, 25, 29. 402/2 Dean of Windsor's Case, 5 Co. Rep. 24 a; S.C., Moore, 399. Cf. Bro. Covenant, pl. 32. Cf. further, Conan v. Kemise, W. Jones, 245 (7 Car. I.). 403/1 F. N. B. 181 N; Sir Henry Nevil's Case, Plowden, 377, 381.