Didactic fiction; Political fiction; Social problems -- Fiction
"Why did your people refuse to bid the second time?" he inquired
finally.
"They saw it was just a waste of time and money," the man replied
frankly.
"What do you mean by that?"
"Why, the job was slated for Graves--that was all. It was clear enough
to us. There's mighty little that goes out of that office except to
Graves."
"Is that so? I asked Mr. Hart particularly to have your company bid on
the contracts."
Then the man became confidential, and explained how a certain ambiguity
in the wording of the specifications made it risky for a contractor to
bid unless he knew just how the architect would treat him; for the
contractor might easily "get stuck" for much more than the possible
profits, though bidding in perfect good faith. The man was willing
enough to talk, once started on the subject, and in the course of half
an hour he explained to the layman some of the chicanery of the
building business.
"So you see, Mr. Pemberton, the contractor, to protect himself when he
doesn't know his man, bids pretty high, and then the favored contractor
can safely go a good bit lower. He has an understanding with the
architect, maybe, and it all depends on how the specifications are
going to be interpreted."
And he told other things,--how some of the firms who had bid had since
got parts of the general contract from the Graves Company, but with an
altered set of specifications.
"It's queer," he ended finally. "We can't see how they'll make a cent
on the contract unless Graves is goin' to rot it clear through."
He explained what he meant by "rotting" it,--the use of cheap grades of
materials and inferior labor, from the foundation stones to the
cornice. In other words, the building would be a "job."
"For those specifications called for a first-class building, and no
mistake,--awful heavy steel work, and cabinet finish, and all that. If
it's built according to specification, you're going to have a
first-class school all right."
The result of this chance conversation was that after consultation with
Judge Phillips, Pemberton sent to Boston for the engineer Trimble, whom
he knew to be absolutely honest and capable.
When Hart left Pemberton, he went directly to Wheeler's office and
exploded to his cousin. His anger at the affront offered to him had
entirely hidden the thought of the disagreeable complications that
might follow. He took a high stand with Wheeler about the trustees'
lack of confidence in him. But the cool lawyer, after hearing his
remonstrances, said placidly:--
"If Pemberton wants this man Trimble to go over the building, I don't
see how you can prevent it. And I don't see the harm in it myself. I
suppose everything is all right. See that it is,--that's your
business. Pemberton would be a bad man to deal with if he found any
crooked work. You'd better look sharp after that fellow Graves."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account