The companions of Pickle: Being a sequel to 'Pickle the spy'Lang, Andrew
History
The companions of Pickle: Being a sequel to 'Pickle the spy'
Lang, Andrew
Jacobites
but when the other fact is borne in mind, that Pickle and
Glengarry make the same errors in the spelling of uncommon
words, the confirmatory proof is very strong. It is not likely
that any letter exists in which Glengarry fully acknowledges
his treachery, and the main evidence must therefore be
circumstantial. If Mr. Lang had now to begin writing his book
with all the additional evidence before him which he has
obtained since its publication, he would probably find few
who would dissent from his conclusion that Pickle the Spy
was no other than Alastair Macdonnell of Glengarry. There may
be coincidences in events in the lives of two men; but it is
incredible that Pickle, when disguising his handwriting, should
fall into the same formation of many of the letters which was
peculiar to Macdonnell of Glengarry. Though begun upon a mere
surmise by Mr. Lang, extended research seems to confirm his
notion as to the identity of these two personages. It is not
a pleasant conclusion for any one who believes that all the
Highlanders engaged in the Rising of 1745 were indomitable and
patriotic heroes. There were blacklegs in the army of Prince
Charles Edward, as there are in every movement of the kind; but
there were also noble characters prepared to shed their blood
and sacrifice their prospects in support of what they believed
to be the rightful cause. Glengarry, apparently, must now take
his place among the execrated traitors.—I am, &c.
‘A. H. MILLAR.
‘London: April 26, 1897.’
I am no expert in handwriting, and I offer no opinion, except that
Pickle’s confessedly feigned hand is more like Glengarry’s careful hand,
in the Stuart Papers, than like his sloping scrawl, meant only for his
own eyes (and these nearly blind) in his Letter Book. The Duke of Atholl
has compared letters from Glengarry, in his possession, with those of
Pickle, and has arrived at the same conclusion as Mr. Millar. Pickle’s
hand is Glengarry’s, disguised.
Such is my chain of evidence towards proving the personal identity of
Pickle and Glengarry. Both men, it is hardly worth while to add, had been
officers in French service. I am aware of not one discrepant feature
to discredit the identity which Pickle practically asserts, when he
declares himself (corroborated by Bruce) to have become, by his father’s
death, Chief of the Macdonnells, just when Old Glengarry died, and Young
Glengarry succeeded to the headship of the clan. To sum up the whole case:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account