The Condition of the Working-Class in England in 1844: with a Preface written in 1892Engels, Friedrich
History
The Condition of the Working-Class in England in 1844: with a Preface written in 1892
Engels, Friedrich
Great Britain -- Economic conditions; Working class -- Great Britain
Surgeon Smellie, of Glasgow, who treated operatives chiefly, says that
forty years is old age for them. {160a} And similar evidence may be
found elsewhere. {160b} In Manchester, this premature old age among the
operatives is so universal that almost every man of forty would be taken
for ten to fifteen years older, while the prosperous classes, men as well
as women, preserve their appearance exceedingly well if they do not drink
too heavily.
The influence of factory-work upon the female physique also is marked and
peculiar. The deformities entailed by long hours of work are much more
serious among women. Protracted work frequently causes deformities of
the pelvis, partly in the shape of abnormal position and development of
the hip bones, partly of malformation of the lower portion of the spinal
column.
"Although," says Dr. Loudon, in his report, "no example of
malformation of the pelvis and of some other affections came under my
notice, these things are nevertheless so common, that every physician
must regard them as probable consequences of such working-hours, and
as vouched for besides by men of the highest medical credibility."
That factory operatives undergo more difficult confinement than other
women is testified to by several midwives and accoucheurs, and also that
they are more liable to miscarriage. {161} Moreover, they suffer from
the general enfeeblement common to all operatives, and, when pregnant,
continue to work in the factory up to the hour of delivery, because
otherwise they lose their wages and are made to fear that they may be
replaced if they stop away too soon. It frequently happens that women
are at work one evening and delivered the next morning, and the case is
none too rare of their being delivered in the factory among the
machinery. And if the gentlemen of the bourgeoisie find nothing
particularly shocking in this, their wives will perhaps admit that it is
a piece of cruelty, an infamous act of barbarism, indirectly to force a
pregnant woman to work twelve or thirteen hours daily (formerly still
longer), up to the day of her delivery, in a standing position, with
frequent stoopings. But this is not all. If these women are not obliged
to resume work within two weeks, they are thankful, and count themselves
fortunate. Many come back to the factory after eight, and even after
three to four days, to resume full work. I once heard a manufacturer ask
an overlooker: "Is so and so not back yet?" "No." "How long since she
was confined?" "A week." "She might surely have been back long ago.
That one over there only stays three days." Naturally, fear of being
discharged, dread of starvation drives her to the factory in spite of her
weakness, in defiance of her pain. The interest of the manufacturer will
not brook that his employees stay at home by reason of illness; they must
not be ill, they must not venture to lie still through a long
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account