What Gothic mixtures the Christian creed drew from the pagan sources,
Richard of Devizes’s chronicle of Richard I.’s crusade, in the twelfth
century, may show. King Richard taunts God with forsaking him: "O fie!
O how unwilling should I be to forsake thee, in so forlorn and dreadful
a position, were I thy lord and advocate, as thou art mine. In sooth,
my standards will in future be despised, not through my fault, but
through thine: in sooth, not through any cowardice of my warfare, art
thou thyself, my king and my God conquered, this day, and not Richard
thy vassal." The religion of the early English poets is anomalous, so
devout and so blasphemous, in the same breath. Such is Chaucer’s
extraordinary confusion of heaven and earth in the picture of Dido.
"She was so fair,
So young, so lusty, with her eyen glad,
That if that God that heaven and earthe made
Would have a love for beauty and goodness,
And womanhede, truth, and seemliness,
Whom should he loven but this lady sweet?
There n’ is no woman to him half so meet."
With these grossnesses, we complacently compare our own taste and
decorum. We think and speak with more temperance and gradation,—but is
not indifferentism as bad as superstition?
We live in a transition period, when the old faiths which comforted
nations, and not only so, but made nations, seem to have spent their
force. I do not find the religions of men at this moment very creditable
to them, but either childish and insignificant, or unmanly and
effeminating. The fatal trait is the divorce between religion and
morality. Here are know-nothing religions, or churches that proscribe
intellect; scortatory religions; slave-holding and slave-trading
religions; and, even in the decent populations, idolatries wherein the
whiteness of the ritual covers scarlet indulgence. The lover of the old
religion complains that our contemporaries, scholars as well as
merchants, succumb to a great despair,—have corrupted into a timorous
conservatism, and believe in nothing. In our large cities, the
population is godless, materialized,—no bond, no fellow-feeling, no
enthusiasm. These are not men, but hungers, thirsts, fevers, and
appetites walking. How is it people manage to live on,—so aimless as
they are? After their peppercorn aims are gained, it seems as if the
lime in their bones alone held them together, and not any worthy
purpose. There is no faith in the intellectual, none in the moral
universe. There is faith in chemistry, in meat, and wine, in wealth, in
machinery, in the steam-engine, galvanic battery, turbine-wheels, sewing
machines, and in public opinion, but not in divine causes. A silent
revolution has loosed the tension of the old religious sects, and, in
place of the gravity and permanence of those societies of opinion, they
run into freak and extravagance. In creeds never was such levity;
witness the heathenisms in Christianity, the periodic "revivals," the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account