The conquest of the great Northwest, Volume 2 (of 2): $b Being the story of the adventurers of England known as the Hudson's Bay Company, new pages in the history of the Canadian northwest and western statesLaut, Agnes C.
History
The conquest of the great Northwest, Volume 2 (of 2): $b Being the story of the adventurers of England known as the Hudson's Bay Company, new pages in the history of the Canadian northwest and western states
Laut, Agnes C.
Hudson Bay -- History; Hudson's Bay Company; Northwest, Canadian
For two years furious waxed debate in Parliament and out on this
request of the Company. The Hudson’s Bay Company as a colonizer was
a new rôle. Mr. Isbister, descendant of Red River people and now a
barrister in London, has something to say as to how the Hudson’s Bay
Company act in the colony of Red River, and Mr. Gladstone in Parliament
openly and hotly opposes the request on the ground that a company which
had a charter of exclusive monopoly for two hundred years entitling it
to colonize and had done nothing, had proved itself incompetent as a
colonizer.
Furious waxed the debate, but the one thing lacking in all long-drawn
out debates is a basis of fact. Only the Hudson’s Bay Company possessed
the facts about this West Coast. Reports of such government emissaries
as Gordon of the Squadron were worse than useless. The opponents were
working in the dark. In the House of Commons were several shareholders
of the Hudson’s Bay Company, chief among them, Ellice, son of the old
Nor’Wester.
The request was officially granted in January, 1849, but with such
absurd restrictions attached, that any one possessing the slightest
knowledge of West Coast conditions must have been aware that the
alleged aim to colonize was but a stalking horse for other designs. The
Company was to be permitted to retain only one-tenth of the proceeds
from its land sales. The other nine-tenths were to be spent improving
the island. What bona fide colonization company would accept such
conditions? Ten per cent. of land sales would not suffice to pay for
advertising. If no settlement were made, the grant was to be revoked
in five years. To the colonists, land was to be sold at £1 ($5.00) an
acre. In Oregon, the colonist could have 640 acres for nothing. For
every one hundred acres sold at $5.00 an acre, the buyer was bound
by covenant to bring to Vancouver Island at _his_ own expense three
families, or six single persons. Last of all and most absurd of all,
at the end of five or ten years, the Government might buy back the
Island by paying to the Company all it had expended. Another point--but
this was not in the official terms--retired servants of the Hudson’s
Bay Company might buy the land at a few shillings an acre. Looking
squarely at this extraordinary contract, only one of two conclusions
can be reached: either the ignorance of conditions was so dense that
dynamite could not have driven a hole through it, or there was no
intention whatever of colonizing Vancouver Island, the real design
being twofold: (1) on the part of the Government to keep this remote
region securely British, for Mormons had talked of escaping persecution
by going to Vancouver Island; (2) on the part of the Company, to hold
colonizing in its own control to be forwarded or retarded as suited its
interests. The Company declared that from the time Lord Grey framed
the conditions of the grant, they knew the scheme was foredoomed to
failure. This did not prevent them accepting the terms; but the fur
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account