The Contemporary Review, Volume 36, September 1879Various
History
The Contemporary Review, Volume 36, September 1879
Various
Arts -- Periodicals; Literature -- Periodicals; Political science -- Periodicals
"In Russia, the feelings of right and justice, which are
systematically and artificially kept down and repressed, and which
have no outlet in public life, concentrate themselves with their
full weight in the verdict of a jury. That which the press had no
liberty of saying during long years, is given vent to in the
debates of a Court of Justice. An accusation is raised on account
of a deed which, though punishable as a crime in itself, has been
produced and nurtured by a system of administrative arbitrariness
and gross ill-treatment that stands morally deep below the deed in
question--a system of corruption which cannot be attacked legally,
nay, which enjoys all the honours the State can award. And who can
help it if an injustice committed day after day, in the name of the
State, without any expiation, weighs more heavily upon the public
conscience than the act of a single person who, boldly risking his
or her own life, rises with a feeling of the deepest indignation
against so rotten a system of Government? It is but too natural,
this wrathful utterance of the popular voice, when it declares that
a high official, who, trusting in the practical approval of the
Imperial favour, ordains corporal punishment according to his
arbitrary caprice against defenceless prisoners, is guilty of a
greater offence than he who feels driven, by a passionate notion of
justice, to constitute himself, of his own free will, an avenger of
the public conscience.... If, in a State afflicted with political
sickness, the institution of the jury had fallen so deep as to work
with the mechanical certainty of a military court, and to heed
nothing but the points of view of jurisprudence, without being
touched by the current of moral aspirations, thus merely
registering, with Byzantine obedience, the paragraphs of a code of
law: such a phenomenon--keeping, as it would, the Government in a
dangerous error as regards public life--would be far more
reprehensible than that verdict of 'not guilty' by which a whole
system of Government was practically condemned."
The Russian Government system Herr von Holtzendorff, who personally
belongs to a very moderate political party, brands as "a system of
arbitrary police ordinances, and of the virtual sovereignty of the
Adjutants-General of the Czar--a system of administrative deportations,
of despotic arrestations, of press-gagging--a swashbuckler's
government." Another German writer of some distinction, Dr. Henry
Jaques, observes--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account