The Continental Monthly, Vol. 1, No. 2, February, 1862: Devoted To Literature And National PolicyVarious
History
The Continental Monthly, Vol. 1, No. 2, February, 1862: Devoted To Literature And National Policy
Various
Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals; United States -- Politics and government -- 19th century -- Periodicals
_Mr. Seward (aside to Mr. Adams)_. The President revokes the exequatur
of Consul Bunch, who has not only been the bearer of communications
between the insurgents and a foreign government in violation of our
laws, but has abused equally the confidence of the two governments by
reporting, without the authority of his government, and in violation of
their own policy, as well as of our national rights, that the proceeding
in which he was engaged was in the nature of a treaty with the
insurgents, and the first step toward a recognition by Great Britain of
their sovereignty. His whole conduct has been, not that of a friend to
this government, nor of a neutral even, but of a partisan of faction and
disunion.
* * * * *
_Lord Lyons_. My government are concerned to find that two British
subjects, Mr. Patrick and Mr. Rahming, have been subjected to arbitrary
arrest.
_Mr. Seward_. At the time of arrest it was not known they were British
subjects. They have been released.
_Lord Lyons_. They applied for habeas corpus, and its exercise was
refused. Congress has not suspended the writ. Our law officers say that
the authority of Congress is necessary to justify this arrest and
imprisonment.
_Mr. Seward (with suavity, but profound dignity, as if the nation
spoke)_. I have to regret that, after so long an official intercourse
between the governments of the United States and Great Britain, it
should be necessary now to inform her Majesty's ministers that _all_
executive proceedings are of the President. Congress has no executive
power or responsibility. The President constitutionally exercises the
right of suspending the writ of habeas corpus. This government does not
question the learning of the legal advisers of the British Crown, or the
justice of the deference which her Majesty's government pays to them;
nevertheless, the British government will hardly expect that the
President will accept _their_ explanation of the Constitution of the
United States!
* * * * *
Are not the following inferences legitimately to be made from a close
and calm study of the published dispatches respecting our foreign
relations with Great Britain, and in connection with much that has
transpired since their congressional publication?--
1. The British government officers were in some way prepared to expect
that the election of Mr. Lincoln would result in an attempted disruption
of the Union. The arrival of Governor Pickens in England just before the
presidential election, and his arrival in New York, and immediate
journey to South Carolina, on the day of that election, may be cited as
one of many coincidences--showing that the spirit of Cobb, Floyd, and
Thompson, if not their doings and plans, were parodied on the other side
of the Atlantic.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account