The Continental Monthly, Vol. 2, No. 2, August, 1862: Devoted to Literature and National PolicyVarious
History
The Continental Monthly, Vol. 2, No. 2, August, 1862: Devoted to Literature and National Policy
Various
Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals; United States -- Politics and government -- 19th century -- Periodicals
Slight sympathy was expressed for Muggins, but in my opinion that was
owing rather to the depravity evinced in the particular attempt than to
any condemnation of his conduct in making an old joke answer the purpose
of a new one. I confess that I don't see why a good pun should be
thrown aside after it has served as the soul of a single sentence. I am
a supporter of the doctrine of Transmigration of Puns. For a true pun
always has a humorous idea behind the verbal quip that is its prominent
characteristic. And though the verbal quip may be 'old as the hills,'
the joke may present a face fresh as that of a young maiden and bear a
meaning merry as her eyes. Thus an adept in this art once renovated two
veritable antiques:
'I tell thee, Binks, that the proposition is incontrovertible; any thing
that is worth doing is worth being _well done_.'
'Well, then, brother Noggs, what hast thou to say to a beef-steak? Does
not thy rule fail thee there?'
'Truly it doth, Binks; but thou wilt grant me that thine is a _rare_
exception?'
'That will I, right readily.' And both laughed heartily, and went their
ways.
--'SIR, YOU ARE TREADING ON MY FAVORITE CORN,' was the mild
protest of one in a crowd against the act of a neighbor who had
encroached on his pedal extremities, by attempting to violate the
philosophical axiom that two bodies can not occupy the same space
simultaneously. The remark raised a laugh; yet it involved a great
truth. Each of us has at least one pet infirmity, which we nurse as
earnestly, with a view to its becoming chronic, (perhaps unwittingly,)
as we strive earnestly to eradicate other morbid troubles. And the
position is true regarding moral as well as physical invalids. Who has
not often been doubly irritated by the removal of his source of
irritation? Thus Paterfamilias Bloggs, having been 'riled' by the
overcrowding of the omnibus in which he proceeds homeward, makes up his
mind that if Materfamilias B. has not provided fish-balls for supper, he
will 'raise a row.' And he so gloats in expectancy over the imaginary
denunciation that he will inflict on that long-suffering female, that he
is quite disappointed, on entering his basement, to discover at a glance
that a dish of beautifully-browned fish-balls decks the evening table.
So Bloggs' wrath is smothered, and smoulders for the rest of the
evening, finding insufficient vent in boxed ears for the children, and
short, crisp replies to civil questions from the older members of the
family. Thus you see that removing a cause does not always do away with
a consequence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account