The Continental Monthly, Vol. 2, No. 2, August, 1862: Devoted to Literature and National PolicyVarious
History
The Continental Monthly, Vol. 2, No. 2, August, 1862: Devoted to Literature and National Policy
Various
Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals; United States -- Politics and government -- 19th century -- Periodicals
--SOMEBODY HAS SAID THAT TO BE A SUCCESSFUL AUTHOR, IT IS ONLY
NECESSARY TO FEEL WHAT YOU WRITE. This I deny, for many reasons
which I might but will not cite, contenting myself with saying that to
write what one feels, though much more gratifying and in a moral sense
far more commendable than to conceal or falsify sentiments, is
dangerous, and has been known to cause a writer to feel not only more
than he wrote or could write, but more than he had any expectation or
desire of feeling in such connection. Thus, whenever under an assumed
but transparent title, I introduce my friend Scroggs into a little
sketch of my production, I never express in that performance my actual
estimate of Scroggs, physically or mentally. Nor in my glowing
description of the incidents of a trip to Catskill Mountain House, do I
confine myself to the expression of what I felt in viewing the many and
varied scenes of rural beauty that presented themselves during the
progress of that undertaking. Do you suppose that I would run the risk
of conveying to Claribella, who was my only companion in that
expedition, that I never was more bored in my life, and that my
conversation was the result of operating with a constantly working
though invisible pump at the well of common-places and platitudes, which
a gentleman accumulates for such emergencies in the course of his social
experience? Heaven preserve my hair, should I venture on such a step.
'But you digress,' some impatient reader suggests.
Digress! That is an impossibility in an article without a topic. But
even if I plead guilty, my impatient critic; did you ever take a walk in
the country, and if so, did you choose those broad roads that lead to
churches and the village stores and the 'Academy,' or did you plunge, by
some little modest path, into the recesses of a grove, careless whither
your steps carried you, so content you were to yield to the enchanting
guidance of accident? And what though, in following your bent, you were
compelled to climb an occasional fence or cross a chance puddle, the
satisfaction of coming suddenly upon some pleasant view, or unexpectedly
entering an apparently previously unexplored nook, more than atoned for
such trifling annoyances. Without digression in some degree, neither
spoken nor written language can be made entertaining to the person
addressed. Who is more discursive than the Autocrat, the Czar of
table-talkers; and whose productions are more charming or wiser? We do
not do our everyday thinking in strictly logical or consistent forms. It
is sufficient to introduce hypotheses, premises, or syllogisms, when
there are ends to be attained by such a course. Impulse is far more
attractive than prim consistency in the character of those we love; and
if this be true as to pet persons, why not in our favorite writings? So
the most charming women I have met would be styled in Spanish _las
inconsecuentes_. Therefore, when amusement is the aim of writing, let
digression have full swing.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account